CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
Chambre des Référés
69d9464ecdc6046d47cdea64
9 avril 2026
[KU] [EV] né le 22 mars 1946 à CAZES MENDENARD (82) 18 - Mme [ER] [QH] [EV] épouse [FY] née le 15 octobre 1944 à MONTAUBAN (82) 19 - M.
Page 30 sur 47
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;FRA;FRE
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1994:0223JUD001675790
23 février 1994
Lee Kun, le Lord Chief Justice Reading en a ainsi énoncé le principe (Kings Bench Reports 1916, 1, p. 341): "Seules des circonstances fort exceptionnelles peuvent justifier un procès en l’absence de l’
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0302DEC001879203
2 mars 2006
which disclosed some facts of the applicant’s biography and criminal file, which, in the applicant’s opinion, were false and humiliating, i.e. the applicant was referred to as a “criminal leader” alias “Kuper
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-167139
8 septembre 2016
( Jėzau Marija, kuo čia apsirengę! ). 2.
ECLI:CEDH:001-144908
19 mai 2014
/01/1959 Aleksandr Valeryevich TREGUBOV Moscow City Court, 21 November 2011 Ms S., Ms L., Ms K., Ms Sav., Mr K., Ms D., Ms R., Ms Z., Ms Zel., victims Ms Sem., Ms B., Ms A., Ms Sam., Mr Kuz
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0920JUD004289817
20 septembre 2018
The Court refers to the principles established in its case ‑ law regarding inadequate conditions of detention (see, for instance, Kud ła v. Poland [GC], no.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0614JUD003834716
14 juin 2018
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0720JUD000345913
20 juillet 2017
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0222JUD001788316
22 février 2018
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0222JUD006752010
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0222JUD005542713
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:1109JUD006298010
9 novembre 2017
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0524JUD006759112
24 mai 2016
The Court refers to the principles established in its case ‑ law regarding inadequate conditions of detention (see, for instance, Kud ła v.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:1019DEC005631119
19 octobre 2021
Convention case-law precisely states that, even if a single remedy does not by itself entirely satisfy the requirements of Article 13, the aggregate of remedies provided for under domestic law may do so (see Kud
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0614JUD002475316
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0322DEC003456220
22 mars 2022
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0524DEC000983903
24 mai 2007
The effect of Article 13 is thus to require the provision of a domestic remedy to deal with the substance of an “arguable” complaint under the Convention and to grant appropriate relief (see Kud ła v.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0504JUD007837813
4 mai 2017
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:1208DEC003113910
8 décembre 2015
xa0; 2363/11 30/09/2010 Şevket KAHRAMAN 10/06/1954 Ankara Sevgi KARADUMAN 4004/11 24/09/2010 Nurhan KUL
CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-196636
25 septembre 2019
60272/08 KARAMAN AND OTHERS 31/01/2012 30/04/2012 29766/03 KARATEPE AND ULAŞ 17/06/2008 17/09/2008 5387/02 KELEKÇIER 28/04/2009 28/07/2009 40160/05 KÖMÜRCÜ MÜDAND No. 2 21/07/2009 21/10/2009 32577/02 KUR