On 16 June 2009 the prosecutor from the Higher Public Prosecutor's Office ( Јавен обвинител во Вишото јавно обвинителство , “the Higher Public Prosecutor”) filed written submissions in which he requested

Consequently, on 27 March 2001 the applicant withdrew the case before the High Court. On 23 April 2001 the High Court took note that the case was withdrawn as settled, and fixed the fees to be paid.

En octobre 1993, la High Court plaça les enfants sous tutelle judiciaire.

On 8 January 2001, the applicant applied to the High Court for bail. On 9   January 2001, the High Court heard and granted his application.

In April 2011, the applicant was interviewed by Sri Lankan High Commission officials.

* * * * EXPOSE DU LITIGE Le 13 juin 2016, la société Centrimex France a adressé à l'association Solidarité Congo une cotation portant sur l'acheminement d'un conteneur de 40 High Cube pour

By a decision of 11 September 2017, the High Court of Galicia dismissed her plea of nullity.

The High Court upheld the parents’ contact rights in respect of all the children, setting contact at three hours four times per year.

The higher-ranking prosecutor’s decisions of 3 and 6   January 2017 were subject to a further appeal to another higher-ranking prosecutor, but neither the applicant nor her company appealed against

    As the City Court had done, the High Court praised the applicant for having aired his critical views on the use of coercive measures.

X..., ressortissant français résidant en France, a, le 23 janvier 1986, assigné devant la High Court of Justice, à Londres, la société Times Newspapers limited et M.

la procédure suivante : Par une requête enregistrée le 26 novembre 2024, les sociétés Akkodis France, Ekis France (désormais Akkodis Doc Sas), Akkodis I et S, Akkodis Ingénierie Produit et Akkodis High

[O], domicilié [Adresse 2], a formé le pourvoi n° X 22-20.486 contre l'arrêt rendu le 22 juin 2022 par la cour d'appel de Versailles (15e chambre), dans le litige l'opposant à la société Uniprotect High

Therefore on the same day the applicant applied to the High Court ex parte.

The applicant was acquitted in June 1994 by Eidsivating High Court ( lagmannsrett ).

On 17 November 2011 the Higher Specialised Court for Civil and Criminal Matters (“the Higher Specialised Court”), by a final ruling, quashed the decisions of 30 and 31   December 2004 in allowing

According to his discharge papers, he was diagnosed with high blood pressure (second degree) with a high risk of silent ischemia and with acute chronic gastritis.

In particular, they allege that the imposition of the high-security regime, combined with various restrictions imposed on them, including intensive video surveillance in the prison and the prohibition