Damage 63.

C D, représenté par la SCP Bourglan Damamme Leonhardt, agissant par Me Leonhardt, demande au Tribunal : 1°) d'annuler l'arrêté du 5 octobre 2021 par lequel le préfet des Bouches-du-Rhône a refusé de

It found in favour of Mr Terentyev and awarded him damages against the applicant. 14.

    The applicant claimed EUR 6,700 in respect of pecuniary damage (17 months of accrued loss in the monthly allowance in the material period), EUR   10,000 in respect of non-pecuniary damage

Further, he requested ATS 30,000 or EUR 2,180.19 for non-pecuniary damage. 31.     The Government did not comment. 32.

The award of damages shall not exceed 14,535 euros; additionally, Section 6 (1), second sentence, shall apply. ...” 22.

The Constanţa Directorate General for Social Welfare and Child Protection (“the Constanţa child protection authority”) visited R. and the children in the new location and kept in touch with the Bucharest

    On 11 January 2007 the Supreme Administrative Court quashed the judgment of the first-instance court as regards non-pecuniary damage and upheld the judgment in respect of pecuniary damage

    Damage 45.

    Damage 46.

    Damage 57.

Romania – see point 4 of the appended table), 43,200 euros (EUR) in respect of pecuniary damage and EUR   5,000 in respect of non-pecuniary damage and for costs and expenses, and dismissed the remainder

    Damage 48.     The applicant claimed 18,000   Romanian lei (RON) in respect of pecuniary damage for the salaries that she had not received during her pre-trial detention.

  Damages 35.     The applicant did not allege any pecuniary damage. 36.

Civil proceedings for damages against D.M. 26.

    Damage 42.     The applicant sought redress for pecuniary damage resulting from his loss of income throughout the entire proceedings.

It was the constant practice of the authorities to hold hearings in camera.

In fact, according to the jurisprudence of the Federal Court of Justice, it sufficed to be aware of having suffered a damage, without conscience of the entirety of the damage being necessary.

A delay of 31   hours in the hospitalisation of the applicant could only lead to minimal damages.