CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
Exporter CSV
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes

7 691 résultats pour « Chilly »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-192582

Admin. suprême

19 mars 2019

19 mars 2019

On 6 May the Child Welfare Service sent a note to the Borsod-Abaúj-Zemplén County Government Office reiterating that, on the basis of the heath visitor’s assessment, the child should not be sent home to

Source officielle

Page 30 sur 385

← PrécédentSuivant →
CE

CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-55701

Admin. suprême

19 février 1999

19 février 1999

  The new law sets out a formal procedure for consulting the natural father, if known, or any person who believes that he is a father of a child born out of wedlock, before a child is placed for adoption

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-197174

Admin. suprême

2 octobre 2019

2 octobre 2019

to Italy, where the applicant resides and where the family lived when the child was born in March 2017.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0603DEC000451911

Admin. suprême

3 juin 2014

3 juin 2014

On 24 August 2001 the applicant gave birth to her third child.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-145138

Admin. suprême

28 mai 2014

28 mai 2014

    Non-contentious proceedings for return of the child On 7 September 2011, relying on the 1980 Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction (“the Hague Convention”

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0726JUD001611215

Admin. suprême

26 juillet 2018

26 juillet 2018

The child had been desired by both.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0125JUD002194903

Admin. suprême

25 janvier 2007

25 janvier 2007

to the child.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-171807

Admin. suprême

9 février 2017

9 février 2017

The court found that the applicant’s behaviour had destroyed the relationship between the father and the child.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:1201JUD007324714

Admin. suprême

1 décembre 2022

1 décembre 2022

The guardian noted that the material conditions and the atmosphere in the house where the child was living together with T.H., and T.H.’s mother and sister, were very good, and the child was well taken

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0411DEC004532221

Admin. suprême

11 avril 2024

11 avril 2024

    The applicants are a child, A, and her mother, B.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-184191

Admin. suprême

29 mai 2018

29 mai 2018

The court underlined that the parent with whom the child lived had no right to interfere with the other parent’s right to see the child and to participate in her upbringing.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-6594

Admin. suprême

7 septembre 1999

7 septembre 1999

Although the decision became final in February 1993, the child remained in public care. The Social Council rejected the parents’ request for further contact with their child.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-249126

Admin. suprême

12 février 2026

12 février 2026

They allegedly agreed that he would return the child to the applicant on 5 November 2017, but he refused to do so.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-234291

Admin. suprême

17 mai 2024

17 mai 2024

Since 2018, upon agreement by her parents after their separation, the child lived with the applicant in Switzerland. The mother remained in Romania.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0218JUD002860908

Admin. suprême

18 février 2014

18 février 2014

I have never believed that I am the father of the child. I have recognised this child as mine because I thought I did not have any other option. ...

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0531DEC003218520

Admin. suprême

31 mai 2022

31 mai 2022

father of the child.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-14171

Admin. suprême

31 août 2023

31 août 2023

The choice of means by which to permit recognition of the legal relationship between the child and the intended parent fell within the States’ margin of appreciation.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1987:0708JUD000927681

Admin. suprême

8 juillet 1987

8 juillet 1987

(a) Reception of a child into care 30.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1987:0708JUD000974982

Admin. suprême

8 juillet 1987

8 juillet 1987

(a) Reception of a child into care 36.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1988:0714DEC001240286

Admin. suprême

14 juillet 1988

14 juillet 1988

to visit the child together.

Source officielle