CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-192582
19 mars 2019
On 6 May the Child Welfare Service sent a note to the Borsod-Abaúj-Zemplén County Government Office reiterating that, on the basis of the heath visitor’s assessment, the child should not be sent home to
Page 30 sur 385
CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-55701
19 février 1999
The new law sets out a formal procedure for consulting the natural father, if known, or any person who believes that he is a father of a child born out of wedlock, before a child is placed for adoption
ECLI:CEDH:001-197174
2 octobre 2019
to Italy, where the applicant resides and where the family lived when the child was born in March 2017.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0603DEC000451911
3 juin 2014
On 24 August 2001 the applicant gave birth to her third child.
ECLI:CEDH:001-145138
28 mai 2014
Non-contentious proceedings for return of the child On 7 September 2011, relying on the 1980 Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction (“the Hague Convention”
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0726JUD001611215
26 juillet 2018
The child had been desired by both.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0125JUD002194903
25 janvier 2007
to the child.
ECLI:CEDH:001-171807
9 février 2017
The court found that the applicant’s behaviour had destroyed the relationship between the father and the child.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:1201JUD007324714
1 décembre 2022
The guardian noted that the material conditions and the atmosphere in the house where the child was living together with T.H., and T.H.’s mother and sister, were very good, and the child was well taken
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0411DEC004532221
11 avril 2024
The applicants are a child, A, and her mother, B.
ECLI:CEDH:001-184191
29 mai 2018
The court underlined that the parent with whom the child lived had no right to interfere with the other parent’s right to see the child and to participate in her upbringing.
CASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-6594
7 septembre 1999
Although the decision became final in February 1993, the child remained in public care. The Social Council rejected the parents’ request for further contact with their child.
ECLI:CEDH:001-249126
12 février 2026
They allegedly agreed that he would return the child to the applicant on 5 November 2017, but he refused to do so.
ECLI:CEDH:001-234291
17 mai 2024
Since 2018, upon agreement by her parents after their separation, the child lived with the applicant in Switzerland. The mother remained in Romania.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0218JUD002860908
18 février 2014
I have never believed that I am the father of the child. I have recognised this child as mine because I thought I did not have any other option. ...
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0531DEC003218520
31 mai 2022
father of the child.
ECLI:CEDH:002-14171
31 août 2023
The choice of means by which to permit recognition of the legal relationship between the child and the intended parent fell within the States’ margin of appreciation.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1987:0708JUD000927681
8 juillet 1987
(a) Reception of a child into care 30.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1987:0708JUD000974982
(a) Reception of a child into care 36.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1988:0714DEC001240286
14 juillet 1988
to visit the child together.