However, as of September 2016, many of the residents had not returned, as they feared another attack. 2.     The circumstances of the applicant 8.

  The raid was in apparent response to an armed attack which had been carried out the day before by PKK guerillas on Ücdamlar Gendarme Station in Ücdamlar hamlet in Pecar village.

The Revolutionäre Zellen , which dissolved itself in 1995, was responsible for at least 186 terrorist attacks.

However, on 11 September 2000 the manager started to mention about the applicant’s involvement in the attack.

following his encounter with the Detective Chief Inspector and shortly before the attack that he had uploaded material to the Internet indicating his intention to carry out the attack. 30.

The attack on him had jeopardised the confidence the local public had had in him and in the entire court.

The attacks were sporadic again, the groups from the Turkish side would return to their C.F.L. and re-group. These attacks were very violent.

He considered that the investigating authorities had failed to conduct an adequate and comprehensive investigation into the attack.

A description of all the attacks is set out in seven episodes in the appended table. 7.

The attacker then ran away. 17.

Two Israeli soldiers were killed in the attack and eight Israeli soldiers as well as four Israeli civilians were wounded.

Assessment of the defendants’ submissions that they had acted in the belief that a terrorist attack had taken place at the General Staff Building 20 .

    Furthermore, the applicants contended that their lives had been under a real and imminent threat due to the military attack on Talish.

2017 respectively SUBJECT MATTER OF the CASE The applications concern the domestic authorities’ refusal to increase the applicants’ compensation for their relatives’ deaths as a result of a terrorist attack

see list appended) SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The applications concern the Audiencia Nacional’s refusal to increase the applicants’ compensation for their relatives’ deaths as a result of a terrorist attack

The applicants complain, under Article 10 of the Convention, of the violation of their freedom of expression, on account of the lack of effective investigation into their allegations of an attack on account

  The day following the attack the police received hospital reports concerning bodily injuries on the applicant and his friend.

Article   14 was therefore applicable under the “private life” aspect of Article   8, having regard also to the level of seriousness of these attacks.

It was concluded that the applicant’s family had most likely died in an attack on their village by rebel fighters who had previously threatened the residents of Znamenskoye because of their cooperation