CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes
Exporter CSV

77 905 résultats pour « Allo »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-11748

Admin. suprême

14 novembre 2017

14 novembre 2017

46-2 Execution of judgment Individual measures General measures Respondent State required to take measures to resolve problems relating to prolonged non-enforcement of final judgments [This summary also

Source officielle

Page 30 sur 3896

← PrécédentSuivant →
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-12331

Admin. suprême

22 janvier 2019

22 janvier 2019

The national courts had carefully analysed all aspects of the case and had held that the said expression, irrespective of its original Croatian literary and poetic meaning, had been used also as an official

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0211DEC001791015

Admin. suprême

11 février 2020

11 février 2020

The court also informed the parties that the seizure measures also concerned various bank accounts in Romania and abroad, shares in commercial companies, and cars belonging to the applicants, all of which

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;FORTHCOMINGJUDGMENTS;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-1914702-2021074

Admin. suprême

9 février 2007

9 février 2007

Turkey (nos 54461/00, 54579/00 and 55922/00) The five applicants are all Turkish nationals employed in the civil service.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:1012DEC002547005

Admin. suprême

12 octobre 2010

12 octobre 2010

The applicant also gave details about the division of the revenue among all the members of the group and stated that she was entitled to twenty percent of each successful transaction set-up by her.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0927DEC000571110

Admin. suprême

27 septembre 2011

27 septembre 2011

Cell no. 8/3 differed in that the inmates shared the lavatory with inmates from four smaller cells situated in the same wing, which also contained a common area of about 10 square metres to which all five

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-55696

Admin. suprême

18 janvier 1999

18 janvier 1999

provided information to the effect that the Turkish authorities are in the process of taking and implementing a number of further measures in order stop all practices of torture and ill-treatment also

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-114351

Admin. suprême

9 octobre 2012

9 octobre 2012

The first applicant was also on a business trip in Nazran at that time. All four applicants stayed in the hotel “Assa” in Nazran (the hotel). 2.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-2337

Admin. suprême

11 décembre 2007

11 décembre 2007

The Supreme Court also listed other criteria that could be taken into account to determine whether there was continuity.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-219835

Admin. suprême

15 septembre 2022

15 septembre 2022

It also submitted that some of the claims were excessive. 9 .

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:1124JUD003426214

Admin. suprême

24 novembre 2016

24 novembre 2016

The first applicant was also convicted under Article 296 of the CAO. 27.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:1130DEC004440407

Admin. suprême

30 novembre 2010

30 novembre 2010

Some of the applicants also raised other complaints.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1988:1214DEC001301387

Admin. suprême

14 décembre 1988

14 décembre 1988

  This latter tax became in fact an example of a once-for-all tax.   A once-for-all tax on wealth is obviously of a more sensitive nature than a once-for-all tax on income.

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;GENERAL;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-1714447-1797320

Admin. suprême

27 juin 2006

27 juin 2006

He also maintained that his complaints were not examined within a reasonable time. He relied on Articles 2 and 6 § 1 of the Convention.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-13721

Admin. suprême

7 juin 2022

7 juin 2022

In August 2013, he was acquitted of all charges made in that case.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0123DEC000300016

Admin. suprême

23 janvier 2024

23 janvier 2024

It also provided that the organised relocation of the graves meant that the RBK would entirely relocate the graves and that it would cover all the related costs. 45.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-111775

Admin. suprême

29 mai 2012

29 mai 2012

    All the applicants appealed against the High Court judgment.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-243216

Admin. suprême

25 avril 2025

25 avril 2025

All individual applicants also complain about the breach of Article 8 of the Convention on account of their or Mr Uliasz’ long-term exposure to severe air pollution that, in their view, has negatively

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:1004JUD005099216

Admin. suprême

4 octobre 2018

4 octobre 2018

Some applicants also raised other complaints under the provisions of the Convention. THE LAW I.     JOINDER OF THE APPLICATIONS 5.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-172732

Admin. suprême

16 mars 2017

16 mars 2017

All extension orders were given in the form of a single decision for all of the accused and of the panel’s own motion, to review the detention.

Source officielle