Such decision is final (Article 27 § 2 of the Convention and Rule 54 § 3) and the Court therefore cannot re-examine those complaints (see Mazepa and Others v.

administrative authorities which do not themselves satisfy the requirements of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention must be subject to subsequent control by a judicial body that has full jurisdiction (see Grande Stevens

  Stefan spent three or four weeks with his parents in the summer of 1982.

However, the applicant’s subjective perception alone cannot suffice to conclude that he/she has suffered a significant disadvantage.

:inline-block } .s7602FED2 { width:18.21pt; display:inline-block } .s60570E66 { width:233.81pt; display:inline-block } FOURTH SECTION DECISION AS TO THE ADMISSIBILITY OF Application no. 41087/98 by Steven

the Somali authorities to working arrangements proposed by the Dutch authorities in February 2014, and that it was not possible to indicate when the negotiations would be finalised ( Tweede Kamer der Staten-Generaal

  On 27 November 1990 the Swedish Immigration Board (statens invandrarverk) rejected her request for a residence and work permit, stating that her relationship with the applicant was not sufficiently

He is represented before the Court by Mr Stefan Zebrowski, a guardian appointed by the Swedish Chief Guardians Board ( Överförmyndarkontoret ).

margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:10pt } .s653E6C45 { font-family:Arial; font-size:6.67pt; vertical-align:super; color:#0069d6 }     FIFTH SECTION DECISION Application no. 67618/09 Stevan

Sten De Geer, a lawyer practising in Stockholm.   3.     The respondent Government are represented by their Agent, Mr.

However, the   Court considers that the total length of the proceedings in the present case cannot be attributed to the inactivity of the administrative authorities or   of the administrative

In such circumstances, the Commission cannot accede to the Government's request.

Given what has been established about this during the hearing, it cannot be held against the applicant that he has submitted various plans.

The note further states that the court cannot decide on the applicant's claims without having examined those files.

  1 have been rejected for non-exhaustion of domestic remedies, in so far as the new remedies provided by the Law no. 165/2013 cannot a priori be presumed ineffective (see paragraph 9 above), the

xa0; Application No. 24770/94                       by ASSOCIATED NEWSPAPERS LIMITED Stewart STEVEN

Stevens and unreservedly apologised for any distress caused."

    The applicants' requests for asylum in Sweden were rejected by the National Immigration Board (Statens invandrarverk) on 5 April 1993 and the applicants' expulsion was ordered.

The court found that his guilt was of a particular gravity, meaning that the remainder of his prison sentence cannot be suspended on probation after 15   years of detention.

  On 31 January 1986 the National Board of Immigration (statens invandrarverk) refused to grant the applicant and his wife permission to stay any longer in Sweden, and ordered that they and their