SUBMISSIONS OF THE PARTIES           A.

Partly admissible;Partly inadmissible

  This part of the application is therefore manifestly ill-founded within the meaning of Article 27 para. 2 (Art. 27-2) of the Convention.

  They claim that under the Convention they are entitled to compensation even if there is no unlawful and faulty behaviour on the part of the authorities.

Partly admissible;Partly inadmissible

Partly admissible;Partly inadmissible

  Proceedings were to be continued upon request by the parties.   The decision was served upon the parties on 1 June 1978.

  If it is of the opinion that reasons would be relevant for the decision on the unlawfulness of the contested decision ... which were so far not known to a party, it must hear the parties thereupon

  The Government note that the policemen became aware of the applicant as he was driving particularly slowly, and partly on the side of the road.

Partly inadmissible;Partly admissible

        The facts of the present case, as submitted by the parties, may be summarised as follows.   A.

        This part of the application must therefore be rejected under Article 27 para. 2 (Art. 27-2) of the Convention as manifestly ill-founded.   2.

  In fact, both parties could independently file an appeal.

  An important point in this regard is that the legal consequence desired by the parties, namely the establishment of family law relations between the second applicant and the third applicant, could

  It follows that this part of the application is manifestly ill-founded within the meaning of Article 27 para. 2 (Art. 27-2) of the Convention.   4.

        The facts of the case, as submitted by the parties, may be summarised as follows.

The facts as submitted by the parties may be summarised as follows.         The second applicant gave birth to a son A. on 29 November 1987.

E. and the parties.   Meanwhile Judge M.H. had taken over the case.

On 25 May 1984 the Court stated that the parties would soon be contacted in order to fix a date for the main hearing.

  The Board directed both parties to institute care proceedings before the District Court.