On 12 December 2003 the Constitutional Court ( Ustavni sud Republike Hrvatske ) declared their complaint inadmissible, because the Municipal Court had meanwhile adopted a judgment in their case.

0pt; text-align:right } THIRD SECTION DECISION Application no. 31302/96 by Ali İsmail DENİZ against Turkey The European Court of Human Rights (Third Section), sitting on 16   January 2003 as a Chamber

One of the children had had to be interviewed a second time by the police.

width:233.81pt; display:inline-block } SECOND SECTION DECISION AS TO THE ADMISSIBILITY OF Application no. 32002/96 by Şadiye ÖZSUCU, Abdullah AKSUCU, Mevlüt and Ramazan KOZAT, Mehmet   Ali DERE, Nadir

    In a decision of 4 November 2010 the Chamber decided to adjourn the examination of the case until the Grand Chamber had delivered its judgment in the case of Nada v.

ROGAI against Italy The European Court of Human Rights (First Section), sitting on 7   May 2002 as a Chamber composed of   Mrs   F.

She further declared that on 25 February 1994 Güngör S.E. had come to the office and had told her that Yusuf Ekinci had disappeared.

Consequently, the impugned measures had been adopted in the wake of an armed conflict which had begun in 1990.

On 14 April 2014 a panel of the Grand Chamber granted that request.

Nadir, on the following grounds: “...

They further stated that as of 2004, State Security Courts had been abolished. 8.

    The Chamber observed that although the applicant had not been directly targeted in person in either the book or the dictionaries in question, he had been able to initiate compensation proceedings

Bulgaria (no. 61259/00) Ahmad Naim Moh Musa is a Jordanian national of Palestinian origin who was born in 1966; his wife, Dessislava Verchova Musa, and their children, Hadjar Ahmad Naim Musa, Nadya Ahmad

  Notwithstanding the fact that the Court had found the applicant’s detention had been unlawful, the Court noted that the applicant was detained in accordance with domestic law and that he had therefore

It complained that the vehicle, which was its property, was confiscated from its owner even if it had not participated to and had not had any knowledge about the commission of the act sanctioned by the

On 22 October 1998 Mr   Wildhaber had decided that, in the interests of the proper administration of justice, a single Grand Chamber should be constituted to hear the instant case and twelve other

to what that aiding and abetting had consisted of and in which circumstances it had taken place.

Following the President’s Kadyrov rise to power, the family had been driven out of Chechnya.

the facts and had wrongly applied domestic law. 11.