The ratio of this limitation on the husband's right to proceed with an action of repudiation had been the favour for the status of legitimacy, resumed by the presumption “ pater is est quem iustae nuptiae

Romania , no. 36188/09, §   25, 13   December 2016, and Iustin Robertino Micu v. Romania , no.   41040/11, §   109, 13 January 2015).

of treatment on 30 March 2017 caused a threat to his life serious enough to engage the State’s responsibility under Article 2 (see, mutatis mutandis and in the ambit of Article 3 of the Convention, Iustin

that the police authorities took account of the applicants’ basic needs, such as by providing them with food, water and access to a toilet (see, mutatis mutandis , Bouyid , cited above, §§ 83-84, and Iustin

reason for this limitation of the husband’s right to proceed with an action for repudiation had been the stand in favour of the status of legitimacy, summed up by the presumption “ pater is est quem iustae