The applicants were represented by Mr Bogdan-Nicolae Bulai and Ms Daniela-Anca Deteşeanu, two lawyers practising in Bucharest.

The new law cannot alter or abolish the already created effects of a legal situation which has extinguished or in the process of execution.” 56 .

It follows that the decisions mentioned by the Government cannot be regarded as “concerning the very core of the case” in the light of Article 35 § 3 of the Convention. 32.

    The Court considers that the serious interference with the applicants’ right to the peaceful enjoyment of their possessions cannot be adequately compensated for by the simple finding of a

    Les témoins Ionel P., fonctionnaire du Gouvernement, et Daniela N., officier militaire, présents au deuxième étage du bâtiment lors des événements décrits ci-dessus, indiquèrent que le capitaine

#xa0;       Application No. 26530/95                       by Daniella

Rödel, a lawyer practising in Datteln.     The facts of the case, as submitted by him, may be summarised as follows.   A.

However, even though the Government have not sought to challenge these reports, the Court cannot for this reason alone accept without question the estimates made by the expert (see Loizidou v.

That protraction cannot be imputed to the respondent Government.

lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) by two Bulgarian nationals, Mrs Ivanka Georgieva Puleva and Mrs Daniela

Having deliberated, decides as follows: THE FACTS The first applicant, Ms Daniela Lipkowsky, is a German national who was born in 1972.

be eliminated or damage caused thereby cannot be compensated for in a manner other than by review.”

In these circumstances, it cannot be concluded that the applicants have lost their victim status for the purposes of this complaint, nor that they have obtained adequate redress for the deprivation of

Thus, in the absence of a declaration under Article 78 of the CPP, which is necessary to acquire civil-party status (and make an actual claim for compensation), it cannot be considered that a civil right

    Section 50 of the Property Act 1951 ( Закон за собствеността ) provides that the owner of a piece of immovable property cannot carry out actions which impede, in more than the usual way,

Identifying shortcomings in this investigation that are similar to those in Association   “21 December 1989” and Others (cited above, §§ 133-145) and Alecu and Others (cited above, § 39), the Court cannot

Thus, any fresh claims by the applicants requesting compensation until 2020 cannot be entertained, nor can the Court take cognisance of the Government’s arguments on the admissibility of the complaint,

actions simplifiée, dont le siège est [...]                            , 2°/ la société Proservia, société à responsabilité limitée, dont le siège est [...]                              , 3°/ Mme Daniela

Dans le cadre de l'enquête, des documents commerciaux et comptables liés à son activité, trois cassettes vidéo contenant les enregistrements de réunions commerciales, des courriers privés et le passeport