level (see Paul and Aubrey Edwards v. the United Kingdom (dec.) no. 46477/99, 4   June 2001).

He was assessed at the police station by an approved social worker, who discussed the matter on the telephone with a consultant psychiatrist.

level (see Paul and Aubrey Edwards v. the United Kingdom , no. 46477/99, dec. 4.6.01).

B, Lot B2A1 [Adresse 1] [Localité 5] Représentées par Me Audrey SCHWAB de la SELARL SELARL 2H Avocats à la cour, avocat au barreau de PARIS, toque : L0056 Ayant pour avocat plaidant Me Philippe LAYE

CABINET LAURENT FAVET la SCP GB2LM AVOCATS TRIBUNAL JUDICIAIRE DE GRENOBLE Jugement du 21 Mai 2026 ENTRE : DEMANDEURS Madame [S] [N], demeurant [Adresse 1] représentée par Maître Audrey

He was assessed at the police station by an approved social worker, who discussed the matter on the telephone with a consultant psychiatrist.

However, whatever mode is employed, the authorities must act of their own motion once the matter has come to their attention.

On 15   August 2008 it was decided not to open a criminal investigation into the matter. It appears that the said decision was quashed on 30   September 2008 and a new inquiry was ordered.

    On 16   July 2001 the investigator found it impossible to identify those responsible and suspended the investigation into the matter.

    Article 35 § 1 of the Convention provides that the Court may only deal with a matter where it has been introduced within six months from date of the final decision in the process of exhaustion

to take as the start of the six ‑ month period the date when he or she first became aware or ought to have become aware of those circumstances rendering the remedy ineffective (see Paul and Audrey

to take as the start of the six ‑ month period the date when he or she first became aware or ought to have become aware of those circumstances rendering the remedy ineffective (see Paul and Audrey

remedy is available in respect of the violation of the constitutional rights [complained of], the constitutional complaint may be lodged only after this remedy has been exhausted. (3)     In matters

Turkey , 19   February 1998, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1998-I, § 86; and Paul and Audrey Edwards , cited above, § 69).

Turkey , 19   February 1998, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1998-I, § 86; and Paul and Audrey Edwards , cited above, § 69). 25.

    The agent for disciplinary matters must investigate the matter if he obtains credible information that the rules of professional conduct have been infringed.

Consequently, when resolving the matter of the accountability of Donatas V. and Darius V., the applicant's argument that the true cause of M.Š.'

to take as the start of the six ‑ month period the date when he or she first became aware or ought to have become aware of those circumstances rendering the remedy ineffective (see Paul and Audrey

Audrey Glover of the Foreign and Commonwealth Office.   3.     On 8 January 1993 the European Commission of Human Rights (First Chamber) declared the application admissible.