D É C I D E : Article 1er : La requête de la SARL Air Attack Technologies est rejetée.

Given the context of the conflict in Chechnya at the relevant time, the Court assumed that the military had reasonably considered that there had been an attack or a risk of attack, and that the air strike

He also recounted the earlier attack, but explained that he had not reported it to the police since he had “not seen his attacker”. 15.

The attack was filmed by one of the assailants.

Article 2 : L’Etat remboursera à la SARL Air Attack Technologies la somme de 33 564 euros.

In the meantime, in a newspaper interview on 3 May 2007, the Minister of Internal Affairs was questioned about the attack on the applicant and stated that the attack in question had been organised by the

The Government denied that the first attack had been carried out by federal forces but acknowledged that the second attack had been and had resulted in human casualties and the destruction of property.

The Government denied that the first attack had been carried out by federal forces but acknowledged that the second attack had been and had resulted in human casualties and the destruction of property.

In support of this argument he referred to the threats and demands to leave the region made by the attackers during the attack on 9 September 2016 and the unknown individuals the day before the attack

The Court of Appeal noted that the investigation into the attack on the applicant had been thorough.

D... est gérant et associé de la SARL Air Attack Technologies.

[U] [Z] a cédé à sa mère [F] une part de la SCI Attick pour sa valeur nominale de 1€ et a signifié cette cession à cette dernière le 18 septembre 2014.

A hooliganism charge remained in relation to another of the accused, who was an adult at the time of the attack.

    The attack on the applicant 8.

    According to the applicant, three individuals took part in the attack.

    The applicant's account of the attack on her on 19 January 2000 8.     In July 2004 the applicant produced a detailed account of the attack on her.

The pilots were granted authorisation to attack. They fired rockets, destroying the truck and several other vehicles.

Several days before the attack, Ronan O’Dowd had seen masked men running up a lane adjacent to the house, in what the applicants believed was a dummy run for the attack.