CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0318JUD001103603
18 mars 2008
Article 246 provides that everyone who is arrested shall be entitled to lodge an appeal with a court challenging the lawfulness of the arrest and the manner of its execution.
Page 29 sur 6151
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0112JUD006287013
12 janvier 2016
Article 249 “... (3) If, by the criminal offence referred to in ...
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:0704JUD002791595
4 juillet 2000
follows: Article 210: "1.
1 / 4 SSR
CETAT:CETATEXT000007742395
23 octobre 1987
..., X... et Y..., - les conclusions de Mme de Clausade, Commissaire du gouvernement ; Sur la recevabilité de la protestation formée devant le tribunal administratif : Considérant qu'aux termes de l'article
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0523JUD001750207
23 mai 2016
The composition of the Grand Chamber was subsequently determined according to the provisions of Article 26 §§ 4 and 5 of the Convention and Rule 24.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0428JUD000685811
28 avril 2015
A restraint measure is initially ordered by the prosecutor, to be subsequently approved by a court decision within forty-eight hours (Articles 244 and 258).
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0528JUD003925717
28 mai 2020
Other developments 24.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:0711JUD002579294
11 juillet 2000
The case was referred to the Court by the European Commission of Human Rights on 24 November 1998, within the three-month period laid down by former Articles 32 § 1 and 47 of the Convention
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0601JUD006150314
1 juin 2017
The provisions of former Articles 125 and 126 CCP (concerning the appointment of additional experts) are covered by the new Article 127 § 3. 90.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0826JUD003401220
26 août 2025
the Athens Court of First Instance adjourned the case, as it considered it necessary – in order for it to make a correct assessment and in order to avoid conflicting judgments – to wait (pursuant to Article
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:1128DEC004829799
28 novembre 2000
Article 104-1 (in force from 21 June 1996 until 24 June 1998): “… the arrested person shall be brought before a judge within not more than 48 hours … .
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:0321JUD004767999
21 mars 2002
of the fact that an appeal is possible against any such decision under the amended Article 109-1 (since 24 June 1998, see above). 53.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:1113JUD001059703
13 novembre 2008
been transferred to it by other Public Prosecutor’s Offices (no. 110 Js 24/88). 9.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:0111DEC004209598
11 janvier 2000
Pursuant to Article 106 § 3 (version in force from 21 June 1996 until 24 June 1998), for the purpose of extending the term of detention on remand a judge is obliged to convene a hearing to
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2001:0109JUD002587494
9 janvier 2001
Article 217: “1.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:1119JUD005177417
19 novembre 2024
2362/1995, Article 22 §§ 1 and 4 of Law no. 1650/1986 and Article 24 § 6 of the Constitution. (b) Second ground 16 .
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0404JUD003046506
4 avril 2013
Such a provision was introduced into the Code of Criminal Procedure in 2008 with its new Article 249 § 3.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:1113JUD002607303
Damages are afforded to the individual concerned in accordance with Articles 249 et seq. of the Civil Code.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:1022JUD000678018
22 octobre 2020
). 24 .
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0720JUD001709502
20 juillet 2010
On 3 November 2003 the Panevėžys District Court convicted the applicant of complicity in armed robbery (Articles 24 § 6 and 180 § 3 of the Criminal Code).