THE LAW Further to the communication of the case under Rule   54   §   2   (b) of the Rules of Court, the Government argued that the applicant lodged the application with the Court

    The Court finds that the applicant’s arguments do not relate to a clerical error, an error in calculation or an obvious mistake within the meaning of Rule 81 of the Rules of Court. 10.

They accordingly requested revision of the judgment within the meaning of Rule 80 of the Rules of Court. 4.

Nielsen , Section Registrar , Having regard to the above application lodged on 1 April 2002, Having regard to the interim measure indicated to the respondent Government under Rule 39 of the Rules of Court

    In accordance with Rule 52 § 1 of the Rules of Court, the President of the Court, Mr L. Wildhaber, assigned the case to the Second Section.

    In accordance with Rule 52 § 1 of the Rules of Court, the President of the Court, Mr L. Wildhaber, assigned the case to the Second Section.

    In accordance with Rule 52 § 1 of the Rules of Court, the President of the Court, Mr L. Wildhaber, assigned the case to the Second Section.

They accordingly asked for the judgment to be revised within the meaning of Rule 80 of the Rules of Court. 4.

    In accordance with Rule 52 § 1 of the Rules of Court, the President of the Court, Mr L. Wildhaber, assigned the case to the Second Section.

The Government alleged that the “prescribed rules” were envisaged by the Decree of the Chairmanship of the Supreme Soviet of the USSR on “Rules for Organising and Holding of Assemblies, Rallies, Street

They accordingly asked for the judgment to be revised within the meaning of Rule 80 of the Rules of Court. 4.

They accordingly asked for the judgment to be revised within the meaning of Rule 80 of the Rules of Court. 4.

They accordingly asked for the judgment to be revised within the meaning of Rule 80 of the Rules of Court. 4.

They accordingly asked for the judgment to be revised within the meaning of Rule 80 of the Rules of Court. 4.

    In accordance with Rule 52 § 1 of the Rules of Court, the President of the Court, Mr L. Wildhaber, assigned the case to the Second Section.

    In accordance with Rule 52 § 1 of the Rules of Court, the President of the Court, Mr L. Wildhaber, assigned the case to the Second Section.

    In accordance with Rule 52 § 1 of the Rules of Court, the President of the Court, Mr L. Wildhaber, assigned the case to the Second Section.

They accordingly asked for the judgment to be revised within the meaning of Rule 80 of the Rules of Court. 4.

to the rules on deportation.