AND · OR · NOT · "…"CodexAI
AND · OR · NOT · "…"DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1971:0330DEC000445170
30 mars 1971
30 mars 1971
SUBMISSIONS OF THE PARTIES The submissions of the parties may be summarised as follows: I. AS TO THE FACTS 1.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1971:0331DEC000446570
31 mars 1971
31 mars 1971
At the same time, it decided with respect to the remaining parts of the application to give notice to the Austrian Government of these parts of the application and to invite the Government to submit its
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1968:0405DEC000225764
5 avril 1968
5 avril 1968
SUBMISSIONS OF THE PARTIES Whereas the written and oral submissions by the parties may be summarised as follows: A. As to the length of the proceedings I. 1.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1963:1217DEC000146862
17 décembre 1963
17 décembre 1963
The facts as represented from the pleadings of the parties appear to be as follows: 1. On 28th July 1949, a Law providing for a public dental service was enacted.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1964:0706DEC000193663
6 juillet 1964
6 juillet 1964
Bail had in fact been fixed on this basis and it would thus appear that this part of the Application was unfounded.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1974:0719DEC000577572
19 juillet 1974
19 juillet 1974
Submissions of the Parties 1.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1976:1006DEC000687875
6 octobre 1976
6 octobre 1976
Partly inadmissible;partly admissible
Résumé IA — à vérifierCASELAW;CLIN;FRA;FRE
ECLI:CEDH:002-6742
23 mars 2000
23 mars 2000
est partie: recevable Le requérant était partie à trois procédures immobilières sans lien entre elles.
Source officielleCASELAW;CLIN;FRA;FRE
ECLI:CEDH:002-6888
6 avril 2000
6 avril 2000
Partly admissible;Partly inadmissible
Résumé IA — à vérifierCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:0430DEC003548997
30 avril 2002
30 avril 2002
M. to take part in the hearings before the court. At a hearing held on 19 January 1998 the co-accused D.M. failed to attend.
Source officielleCASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-6250
22 novembre 2001
22 novembre 2001
Partly admissible;Partly inadmissible
Résumé IA — à vérifierCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:0113DEC005593900
13 janvier 2004
13 janvier 2004
The Court considers, in the light of the parties’ submissions, that this part of the application also raises serious issues of fact and law under the Convention, the determination of which requires an
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0313DEC002723803
13 mars 2008
13 mars 2008
The circumstances of the case The facts of the case, as submitted by the parties, may be summarised as follows. 1.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1981:0319DEC000787877
19 mars 1981
19 mars 1981
Partly admissible;Partly inadmissible
Résumé IA — à vérifierCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2001:1129DEC005246499
29 novembre 2001
29 novembre 2001
The circumstances of the case The facts of the case, as submitted by the parties, may be summarised as follows.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:1213DEC004158598
13 décembre 2005
13 décembre 2005
Under the said provision the district court could adjourn the case upon request by a party, for example if the said party wished to adduce further evidence.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1997:1201DEC002726795
1 décembre 1997
1 décembre 1997
Particular circumstances of the case The facts as presented by the parties may be summarised as follows.
Source officielleCASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-4862
22 mai 2003
22 mai 2003
Partly admissible;Partly inadmissible
Résumé IA — à vérifierCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2001:0628DEC005681100
28 juin 2001
28 juin 2001
The facts of the case, as submitted by the parties, may be summarised as follows. In 1986 the applicant commenced his military training in Iran.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0214DEC006973501
14 février 2006
14 février 2006
In its reasoning, the Regional Court considered in particular the fact that the first applicant had for the most part confessed his crime and that the crime had to a large part been committed due to the
Source officiellePage 29 sur 93779