could communicate confidentially with their lawyer, were harmed.

The applicant had also acted with competitive intent.

son représentant légal en exercice [Adresse 4] [Adresse 4] Représentée par Me Jean-michel DIVISIA de la SCP COULOMB DIVISIA CHIARINI, Postulant, avocat au barreau de NIMES Représentée par Me Harald

  It was uneven, pointed to the right, and was rock-hard and sore.   It’s still hard and uneven almost two years later.

Allow me not to comment on it because I would have been forced to use very blunt language.

preventive detention was also proportionate. 2.

[the] only thing that could not have been foreseen – it was clear that he would say that this was not true in the pre-trial proceedings; all accused do so, Gypsies also do so, including in cases – this

All these requests were refused.

He also alleged that the plot of land was not the property of the University but of the Romanian State.

Sometimes, the applicant would be placed in this cell with several other inmates and, the space not being sufficient for them to sit on the floor, they all had to stand all the time.

The court rejected the applicants’ claims for pecuniary damage as manifestly ill-founded, holding that the bailiff had taken all the necessary steps to enforce the final judgment.

  On being further interrogated on 20   October 1993, the applicant also confessed to this offence.

It submitted that on the early morning of 31 March 1995 the children had been at home alone. T. was wandering about in the garden alone at 0°C, wearing only pyjamas.

  Article 8 guarantees the right of privacy and is also violated. Since Mr. X. is incarcerated, he is hardly a threat to public peace and order or a threat to the 'freedom of others'.

The article raised questions as to whether it had really been necessary to shut down the farm and where all the animals had gone.

Another witness, Mrs   G.P., claimed that it had been the applicant who had hit the defendant with a shovel, and that the defendant had not harmed her.

That way he also had the chance to live a drug-free life after release from prison.

He also complained that four officers had kicked him all over, put a gas mask on him and blocked the nose vent, twisted his arms, and struck him with a truncheon on his legs and knees.

In so far as the measure applied equally to all those concerned by the legal instrument, it could not be regarded as discriminatory.