As the Court has acknowledged on many occasions, such matters correspond to the general interest of the community. 61.

However, when the prison administration of Zaporozhie Prison no. 2 had insisted that he share the cell with somebody else , he had agreed. 21.

As they wanted to set up a family site, in 1986 they bought a piece of land, known as Cinderbarrow Malt Kiln, Yealand Redmayne, Carnforth in Lancashire.

  18/1987/141/195, 25 October 1989, §   60; Matti and Marianne Hiltunen against Finland (dec.), no.   30337/96, 28   September 1999).

    Mr   L. was the owner of a mail-order company.

letter of 1 December 2009, the Government informed the   Court, without attaching a copy of the relevant postal receipt in support, that the requested items of evidence had been sent by ordinary mail

Malte ; 27.8.1991, Philis c. Grèce ; 26.11.1991, Observer et Guardian c. Royaume-Uni ; 25.6.1992, Thorgeir Thorgeirson c. Islande ; 9.12.1994, Lόpez Ostra c. Espagne ; 8.6.1995, Yağcı et Sargın c.

He did not mention Angela Bollan to his supervisor or anyone else. He overlooked her.

  2) , no. 36815/97, § 71, 15 July 2004, and Matos e Silva, Lda., and Others v. Portugal , 16 September 1996, § 85, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1996-IV). 48.

  Reference is made to the Van Marle judgment (see Eur. Court H.R., judgment of 26 June 1986, Series A no. 101, p. 12, para. 36).

Among them – the address of an American, Patrick Nolan, who passes his time in Rostov, and two e-mail addresses of the CIA.

All inmates were provided with wadded mattresses, cotton blankets and sheets. The applicant's cell was equipped with a sanitary unit, including a lavatory pan and a wash stand.

[L] 28076,10 € contrepartie financière d ela la clause de non-concurrence 2807,61 € de congés payés afférents Débouté M.

    Neither he, nor anyone else in his family had been politically active.

There was no limitation on the mail they could receive. The inmates could receive two small packets a year. They were allowed to have a daily one-hour walk in the fresh air.

Not a single one of these safeguards is to be found as a matter of established law in England, and only a few corresponding provisions exist as a matter of administrative procedure.

    As regards Article 21, the Explanatory Report by Ms Elisa Pérez-Vera on the drafting of the Hague Child Abduction Convention, which is to be found at http://www.hcch.net/upload/expl28.pdf

In support of his claim, he submitted e-mail correspondence with members of his family. 14.

It had thereby unjustifiably shifted the burden of proof to him as regards those matters.