Also, during the deliberations he could have presented precise arguments in his defence by relying on all of the available evidence.

During the domestic pre-investigation inquiries the question of exactly how the injuries had been inflicted had not been addressed.

On 8 March 2007 the applicant was taken into police custody in Istanbul on suspicion of throwing a Molotov cocktail at a city bus during a demonstration which was held on 15 February 2007 in favour of

During subsequent interrogations between January and August 1999 the applicant refused legal assistance. He was then assigned legal-aid counsel.

. 19120/15 By a judgment of the Zagreb Minor Offences Court ( Prekršajni sud u Zagrebu ) of 9 August 2012, the applicant was found guilty of sport hooliganism related to disorder that he had caused during

On the same date the Prosecutor General of Russia sent a letter to the Prosecutor General of Armenia assuring him that during the applicant’s detention and, in case of conviction, during the serving of

    During his stay, he was accommodated in a five-bed container both in the asylum and alien policing sector.

    The applicants complained principally of the inadequate conditions of detention during their transport.

    During the trial L.A. denied that she had given any evidence against the applicant during the investigation and stated that she knew the applicant as a tax officer to whom she had been submitting

    The applicants complained about their confinement in a metal cage in the courtroom during the criminal proceedings against them.

    Functioning of the courts during the war 25 .

    The proceedings commenced before the Izmir State Security Court and during the proceedings the applicant was represented by a lawyer.

[Localité 3] Représentée par Maître LAMBERT loco Maître GALLARDO, avocat au barreau de PAU APPELANTE ET : Monsieur [E] [Y] [Adresse 4] [Localité 2] Représenté par Maître DUCUING

It was thus questionable whether the applicant had indeed not wished to be present during the search.

  32541/08 and 43441/08, §§   122-39, ECHR 2014 (extracts), as regards detention in a metal cage during court hearings; Idalov v. Russia   [GC], no.

During that meeting he gave the investigator LVL 27,000, after which the second applicant was arrested by the KNAB officers. 1.     The pre-trial investigation 5.

During initial questioning Mr Ka. And Mr Ef.

During this period he was observed thirty-six times by the prison staff.

Finally, the second applicant complained of having been beaten during the attempt to remove him on 1   September 2016, as it emerged, among others, from the first applicant’s declarations during his