The applicants alleged that they were ill-treated in the course of training on, among other things, suppression of prison riots, and responding to hostage-taking and terrorist attacks.

Exhaustion of domestic remedies Effective domestic remedy Extraordinary remedy dependent on the discretionary power of a public authority: inadmissible The applicant, who was found guilty of an armed attack

In 2002 he was seriously injured when a bomb exploded in his hands while he was preparing an attack.

against Estonia lodged on 9 June 2017 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The complaints concern handcuffing the applicant, a prisoner, to the hospital bed during a four-day period after he had suffered a heart attack

Taking into account those conditions and risks, he concluded that it was not possible to authorise the applicant’s transfer to Russia either by air or land, as he would risk suffering a heart attack or

    Has the applicant in application no. 32219/24 been subjected to inhuman treatment contrary to Article   3 of the Convention on account of her suffering due to Russian military attacks

  According to the applicant, the victims of the attack were collaborators who had delivered a group of 12 Partisans into the hands of the Germans some three months earlier.

In the face of such an unprecedented and flagrant attack on the fundamental values of the Council of Europe and the object and purpose of the Convention, the Court decided that it ought to reflect anew

Civil servants had to enjoy public confidence if they were to be successful in performing their tasks and it might therefore be necessary to protect them from offensive verbal attacks when on duty.

village – Even if the decision to ban the demonstration was erroneous, and the blockage of Usukhchay village was disproportionate, that did not give the protesters the right to block a federal road or attack

criteria without which they could not be characterised as a crime against humanity, and in particular whether they were to be regarded as forming part of a state policy involving massive and systematic attacks

  According to the public prosecutor’s office and the Latvian courts, the applicant led a platoon responsible for an attack on the village of Mazie Bati (in the district of Ludza) on 27 May 1944 which

  49542/16 16 August 2016 Articles 6 and 13 of the Convention – the applicant’s rights as a victim of ill ‑ treatment by third parties were not observed; impunity of the attackers; wrong dropping

On 30 March 2007 his mother requested that the prosecutors institute a criminal investigation into the attack.

He was suspected of homicide, causing injuries by the explosion of a bomb in the Republic of Uzbekistan and an attempted terrorist attack on the President of Uzbekistan.

Moreover, the applicant had been wrong to assume that improper attacks on religious groups had to be tolerated even if they were based on untrue facts.

Nevertheless, the Kuchis had returned a year later, carrying out their attacks on the region over a period of about three months.

Having regard to the seriousness of the attacks and their widespread nature, the Government could not rely on the investigations lodged by individual public prosecutors into specific incidents, which did

This ruling, taken on its own or coupled with the lack of measures to protect the journalist against attacks by nationalist extremists, had amounted to interference with the exercise of his right to freedom