13) against the Italian Republic lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) by an Italian national, Mr Alessandro

    Regard must be had as to exactly how the investigation was carried out, and whether it can be qualified as effective within the meaning of Article 2 of the Convention. 38.

le n° 842 689 556 - [Adresse 22] pris en la personne de son représentant légal en exercice domicilié en cette qualité audit siège, dont le siège social est sis [Adresse 21] représentée par Maître Alexandre

APPELANT Monsieu [J] [O] né le [Date naissance 1] 1965 à [Localité 2] (01) de nationalité française, demeurant Chez Mme [O] [P] - [Adresse 1] [Localité 3] [Adresse 2] Représenté par Me Alexandre

In the case of Šterjov and Others v. the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, The European Court of Human Rights (First Section), sitting as a Committee composed of:   Linos-Alexandre Sicilianos

#xa0; February 2014 as a Chamber composed of:   Isabelle Berro-Lefèvre, President,   Mirjana Lazarova Trajkovska,   Julia Laffranque,   Paulo Pinto de Albuquerque,   Linos-Alexandre

le Conseil de Prud'hommes - Formation paritaire de LONGJUMEAU section RG n° 14/00766 APPELANT Monsieur [I] [B] [Adresse 1] [Adresse 1] [Adresse 1] comparant en personne, assisté de Me Alexandra

However, the Court cannot accept this argument.

width:50.9pt; display:inline-block } .s2FC40192 { width:266.5pt; display:inline-block } QUATRIÈME SECTION   DÉCISION   SUR LA RECEVABILITÉ   de la requête n° 51188/99 présentée par Alejandro

    In the Court’s view, the fact that the first applicant did not vacate the flat at least until December 2008 cannot be considered as “compensation”.

  The Commission considers that it cannot at this stage on the basis of the file determine the admissibility of these complaints.

Moldova (n° 25464/05) Le requérant, Alexandru Gavrilovici, est un ressortissant moldave né en 1954 et résidant à Palanca (Moldova).

O'Boyle , Section Registrar , Having regard to the above application lodged on 9 May 2001, Having deliberated, decides as follows: THE FACTS The applicant, Mr Alexander Obluk, is a Slovakian national who

It is not a subjective feeling and cannot be chosen arbitrarily.

titre de dommages-intérêts ; "aux motifs qu'il est démontré, et non contesté par les parties, que le montant des frais médicaux et d'hospitalisation versés par la LVA, organisme social de droit allemand

In this respect the Court observes that hindrance can amount to a violation of the Convention just like a legal impediment. 64.

Disputes, resolved and unresolved, regarding their earlier behaviour are matters to which one can expect attention to be drawn.

Therefore, the applicant cannot rely on the cited decisions as consistent and uniform case-law.

    Code of Canon Law 42.