The buyer of the balance sheet obtained a tax refund which was paid over to the seller together with the dividends as part of the purchase price.

It follows that the application is incompatible ratione personae with the provisions of the Convention within the meaning of Article 35   §   3   (a) and must be rejected in accordance with

In 2009 the first applicant sold her share in the house to L. On 13   March 2009 the regional registration service registered L.’s title to one half of the house.

On 6 January 1998 the applicant allocated his share of the flat to the Union for use. At an unspecified time the Union renovated the flat at its own expense. It has used it as its office ever since.

Then she opened the gate and held the dogs back.

share options.

of land equal to 5.15 ha upon leaving the former collective farm as well as their share of the land given for the establishment of Luch Farm as a “lifetime inheritable possession”.

She again asked for a meeting. On 13 February 2001 the applicant submitted her own bid in response to the public call for tenders for external haulage services.

Meetings between D.N. and STT officers took place on 11, 12 and 13 July 2012.

There was a problem with sheets, especially for foreign prisoners.

Alongside the articles the applicants have submitted a separate sheet, stating: ‘The articles of association of Ilinden were discussed and adopted at the founding meeting on 26 October 1997’.

and securities), in which she claimed to own a fifty per cent share.

    According to information obtained from the Latvian State Archive, in 1933 A.S. had acquired property rights to an undivided share of land, which included part of a forest and unregistered

initial non-disclosure by the applicant that his share concerned only one third of the domestic award, two thirds belonging to his siblings.

The Republic of Slovenia will assume the appropriate share of those of the SFRY’s national debts [in respect of which] direct [creditors] cannot be established.

It instructed them to assess the value of the sheep slaughtered. 9.

At 4.10 p.m. a court clerk placed the judge’s decision – marked as urgent – on the desk of the District Court’s messenger.

A six-page fact sheet was produced and distributed as part of that campaign.

However, they had used the money for their personal purposes to purchase shares from different private companies, including the company which shares the applicant had bought.