On 23 November 2016 the complaint concerning the conditions of his detention in Kielce Remand Centre from 6 September to 4 October 2012 was communicated to the Government and the remainder

State to third parties.

The Government’s objection to that effect must therefore be dismissed. 9.

to allow grave attacks on physical and mental integrity to go unpunished, or for serious offences to be punished by excessively lenient sanctions.

It recommended psychological counselling for X to learn to act in Y’s best interest.

company’s right of access to a court.

AS TO THE FACTS 6. Mr Miguel Castells, a Spanish national, resides at San Sebastián (Guipúzcoa), where he is a lawyer.

come to light. 8.

It did not give any further reasoning as to a referral to the CJEU. 4.

The painting was on loan to the Silesian Museum of Fine Arts in Breslau. In 1942 it was transported to Kamenz. After the war the Polish authorities confiscated the painting and took it to Warsaw.

  1 to the Convention to the Romanian Government (“the Government”), represented by their Agent, Ms   O.F.

of the constitutional principle that property was to be presumed to have been acquired in a licit manner.

    Being the master of the characterisation to be given in law to the facts of the case (see, for example, Radomilja and Others v. Croatia [GC], no.

    As to the Government’s argument that by failing to disclose her entrepreneurial status the applicant had contributed to the situation in question, the Court notes the following.

Moreover, proceedings which were eventually found to be time ‑ barred were not, in themselves, capable of causing harm to the individual concerned or of invalidating the decision to close the case

    Regard being had to the documents in its possession and to its case ‑ law (see, in particular, Muršić , cited above, §§ 181 and 184), the Court considers it reasonable to award the

    The County Court adjourned the case to allow the prosecution time to prepare its submissions on the applicant’s request.

It refused to evict the tenants but ordered that they may no longer rely on Article 12 of the Ordinance to maintain title to the property. No costs were to be paid by the applicants.

Court to strike the applications out of the list of cases and the applicants’ reply to that declaration, Having deliberated, decides as follows: FACTS AND PROCEDURE 1.