AND · OR · NOT · "…"CodexAI
AND · OR · NOT · "…"DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:1103DEC002398008
3 novembre 2009
3 novembre 2009
39 of the Rules of Court on 23 May 2008, Having regard to the urgent notification of further submissions under Rule 40 of the Rules of Court on 20 August 2008, Having regard to the observations submitted
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0906DEC006385610
6 septembre 2011
6 septembre 2011
Concurrently, he also requested the Court, on 3 November 2010, to order to the Georgian Government, under Rule 39 of the Rules of Court, that his extradition to Kazakhstan be suspended.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1991:1209DEC001810091
9 décembre 1991
9 décembre 1991
On 19 April 1991 the Commission decided not to give an indication under Rule 36 of its Rules of Procedure.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0119DEC005376420
19 janvier 2023
19 janvier 2023
47 § 4 of the Rules of Court, Having regard to the interim measure indicated to the respondent Government under Rule 39 of the Rules of Court and the decision to lift that measure, Having deliberated
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0120DEC003351516
20 janvier 2022
20 janvier 2022
Moreover, and although the Court is able to make an award for costs when it strikes an application out in accordance with Article 37 of the Convention (Rule 43 § 4 of the Rules of Court), it notes that
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-159013
2 novembre 2015
2 novembre 2015
(b) The Revised Standard Minimum Rules for the Treatment of Prisoners (the “Mandela Rules”) 35.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:1213DEC003045709
13 décembre 2011
13 décembre 2011
THE LAW The Court considers it appropriate to join the applications (Rule 42 § 1 of the Rules of Court).
Source officielleCASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:0227JUD003174096
27 février 2003
27 février 2003
The application was allocated to the Second Section of the Court (Rule 52 § 1 of the Rules of Court).
Source officielleCASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:1218JUD007435211
18 décembre 2012
18 décembre 2012
RULE 39 OF THE RULES OF COURT 21.
Source officielleCASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1994:0228JUD001658090
28 février 1994
28 février 1994
the lawyer who would represent him (Rule 30).
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:1006DEC000341805
6 octobre 2005
6 octobre 2005
Berger , Section Registrar , Having regard to the above application lodged on 27 January 2005, Having regard to the interim measure indicated to the respondent Government under Rule 39 of the Rules of
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1986:0512DEC001056083
12 mai 1986
12 mai 1986
On 11 May 1984 the Commission decided to bring the application to the notice of the respondent Government pursuant to Rule 42 para. 2(b) of the Rules of Procedure without requesting observations
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0905DEC002073515
5 septembre 2017
5 septembre 2017
On 4 May 2016 the President of the Section, under Rule 54 § 2 (a) of the Rules of Court, requested the Russian Government to submit information on the applicant’s whereabouts and any investigation into
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:1214DEC000702807
14 décembre 2010
14 décembre 2010
39 of the Rules of Court, Having regard to the decision to grant priority to the above application under Rule 41 of the Rules of Court, Having regard to the observations submitted by the respondent Government
Source officielleCASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0307JUD000721914
7 mars 2019
7 mars 2019
They accordingly requested that the judgment be revised within the meaning of Rule 80 of the Rules of Court. 4.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:1005DEC006068208
5 octobre 2010
5 octobre 2010
The parties then filed written observations on the admissibility and merits of the case (Rule 59 §1 of the Rules of Court). 8.
Source officielleCASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:1208JUD005885800
8 décembre 2005
8 décembre 2005
The application was allocated to the First Section of the Court (Rule 52 § 1 of the Rules of Court).
Source officielleCASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1999:1019JUD004358498
19 octobre 1999
19 octobre 1999
Levits (Rule 26 § 1 (b)). 4.
Source officielleCASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1999:1019JUD004359898
19 octobre 1999
19 octobre 1999
Levits (Rule 26 § 1 (b)). 4.
Source officielleCASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1999:1005JUD003345596
5 octobre 1999
5 octobre 1999
In accordance with Rule 52 § 1 of the Rules of Court, the President of the Court, Mr L. Wildhaber, assigned the case to the Second Section.
Source officiellePage 28 sur 2215