CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:1114JUD001257612
14 novembre 2019
Article 41 of the Convention provides: “If the Court finds that there has been a violation of the Convention or the Protocols thereto, and if the internal law of the High Contracting
Page 28 sur 31
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:1214JUD002391415
14 décembre 2021
No other evidence could be collected since there was no such evidence. In particular, this incident had not been filmed.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0116JUD004906612
16 janvier 2024
The voucher could be annulled within three years from being issued.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0117JUD002687917
17 janvier 2023
S. and their three children (applicants two, three and four) were lawfully on the territory of the Republic of Moldova, allegedly fleeing from persecution in their home country, Georgia.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:1108JUD000268312
8 novembre 2018
There can be no doubt about the fact that there is a right within the meaning of Article 6 § 1 where a substantive right recognised in domestic law is accompanied by a procedural right to have that right
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0317JUD000520710
17 mars 2016
There is accordingly a violation of Article 13 of the Convention (see Manushaqe Puto and Others , cited above, §§ 72-84 and the references cited therein). III.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0704JUD001663104
4 juillet 2006
On 5 April 1991 the applicant, accused together with other persons of various counts of aggravated theft (including theft in various factories and car theft), was arraigned before the Court
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:1024JUD003582903
24 octobre 2006
Article 41 of the Convention provides: “If the Court finds that there has been a violation of the Convention or the Protocols thereto, and if the internal law of the High Contracting Party
Ch civ. 1-4 construction
69f97a0bcdc6046d47a112e4
4 mai 2026
(solution bois-gaz), divisé entre la partie n°1, revenant à la société Crystal, relative aux travaux d'installation des équipements thermiques et la partie n°2, revenant à la société Dalkia, relative
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:0109JUD004533099
9 janvier 2003
It remains to be ascertained whether there existed a justification for the difference of treatment. 39.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0906DEC000030011
6 septembre 2016
He has been away from school for nearly three months at a critical time.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:1110JUD001347911
10 novembre 2016
Thereafter they had all entered the room where parcels for prisoners were dropped off and there he had seen the applicant putting the syringe inside the cake and spreading the cream so that it could not
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0428JUD002265308
28 avril 2016
Furthermore, there was nothing to suggest that there were any reasons to fear that the lorry could be used again for the commission of offences (see Andonoski , cited above, § 36 in fine
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:1119JUD000192014
19 novembre 2020
One of the dissenting judges stated that under domestic law there was no remedy, much less a judicial one, against the Decision.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:1130JUD004802012
30 novembre 2021
Russia , no. 4663/05, § 53, 10 February 2011, and the case-law cited therein). 57.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:1217JUD001810204
17 décembre 2024
The second applicant, who had left Abkhazia temporarily in 1993 to attend his mother’s funeral, returned to the village of Psakhara on an unspecified date thereafter.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:1215JUD003648712
15 décembre 2016
On 24 November 2008 the regional State Provincial Office found that there was no minimum age for hearing a child and that the three-year age ‑ limit for child psychiatric interviews
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0321JUD003814420
21 mars 2023
13320/02, § 303, 2 June 2015, and the cases cited therein). 41.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0521DEC003980123
21 mai 2024
The Constitutional Court [has] thereby changed its previous practice of sending complainants the so-called appeal-on-points-of-law letter in such situations.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0718JUD004925522
18 juillet 2023
In their observations, the Government submitted that, in February 2023, there was a waiting time of at least three weeks between the indication of an interim measure by the Court and actually being assigned