CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes
Exporter CSV

617 résultats pour « Pauline THERET »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:1114JUD001257612

Admin. suprême

14 novembre 2019

14 novembre 2019

    Article   41 of the Convention provides: “If the Court finds that there has been a violation of the Convention or the Protocols thereto, and if the internal law of the High Contracting

Page 28 sur 31

← PrécédentSuivant →
Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:1214JUD002391415

Admin. suprême

14 décembre 2021

14 décembre 2021

No other evidence could be collected since there was no such evidence. In particular, this incident had not been filmed.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0116JUD004906612

Admin. suprême

16 janvier 2024

16 janvier 2024

The voucher could be annulled within three years from being issued.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0117JUD002687917

Admin. suprême

17 janvier 2023

17 janvier 2023

S. and their three children (applicants two, three and four) were lawfully on the territory of the Republic of Moldova, allegedly fleeing from persecution in their home country, Georgia.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:1108JUD000268312

Admin. suprême

8 novembre 2018

8 novembre 2018

There can be no doubt about the fact that there is a right within the meaning of Article 6 § 1 where a substantive right recognised in domestic law is accompanied by a procedural right to have that right

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0317JUD000520710

Admin. suprême

17 mars 2016

17 mars 2016

There is accordingly a violation of Article   13 of the Convention (see Manushaqe Puto and Others , cited above, §§ 72-84 and the references cited therein). III.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0704JUD001663104

Admin. suprême

4 juillet 2006

4 juillet 2006

    On 5 April 1991 the applicant, accused together with other persons of various counts of aggravated theft (including theft in various factories and car theft), was arraigned before the Court

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:1024JUD003582903

Admin. suprême

24 octobre 2006

24 octobre 2006

    Article 41 of the Convention provides: “If the Court finds that there has been a violation of the Convention or the Protocols thereto, and if the internal law of the High Contracting Party

Source officielle
CA

Ch civ. 1-4 construction

69f97a0bcdc6046d47a112e4

Appel

4 mai 2026

4 mai 2026

(solution bois-gaz), divisé entre la partie n°1, revenant à la société Crystal, relative aux travaux d'installation des équipements thermiques et la partie n°2, revenant à la société Dalkia, relative

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:0109JUD004533099

Admin. suprême

9 janvier 2003

9 janvier 2003

It remains to be ascertained whether there existed a justification for the difference of treatment. 39.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0906DEC000030011

Admin. suprême

6 septembre 2016

6 septembre 2016

    He has been away from school for nearly three months at a critical time.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:1110JUD001347911

Admin. suprême

10 novembre 2016

10 novembre 2016

Thereafter they had all entered the room where parcels for prisoners were dropped off and there he had seen the applicant putting the syringe inside the cake and spreading the cream so that it could not

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0428JUD002265308

Admin. suprême

28 avril 2016

28 avril 2016

    Furthermore, there was nothing to suggest that there were any reasons to fear that the lorry could be used again for the commission of offences (see Andonoski , cited above, § 36 in fine

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:1119JUD000192014

Admin. suprême

19 novembre 2020

19 novembre 2020

One of the dissenting judges stated that under domestic law there was no remedy, much less a judicial one, against the Decision.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:1130JUD004802012

Admin. suprême

30 novembre 2021

30 novembre 2021

Russia , no. 4663/05, § 53, 10 February 2011, and the case-law cited therein). 57.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:1217JUD001810204

Admin. suprême

17 décembre 2024

17 décembre 2024

The second applicant, who had left Abkhazia temporarily in 1993 to attend his mother’s funeral, returned to the village of Psakhara on an unspecified date thereafter.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:1215JUD003648712

Admin. suprême

15 décembre 2016

15 décembre 2016

    On 24 November 2008 the regional State Provincial Office found that there was no minimum age for hearing a child and that the three-year age ‑ limit for child psychiatric interviews

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0321JUD003814420

Admin. suprême

21 mars 2023

21 mars 2023

  13320/02, § 303, 2 June 2015, and the cases cited therein). 41.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0521DEC003980123

Admin. suprême

21 mai 2024

21 mai 2024

The Constitutional Court [has] thereby changed its previous practice of sending complainants the so-called appeal-on-points-of-law letter in such situations.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0718JUD004925522

Admin. suprême

18 juillet 2023

18 juillet 2023

In their observations, the Government submitted that, in February 2023, there was a waiting time of at least three weeks between the indication of an interim measure by the Court and actually being assigned

Source officielle