CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
Cour d'Appel
6253ca01bd3db21cbdd89cfa
31 janvier 2008
Hadira De nationalité algérienne, situation familiale inconnue, intérimaire Demeurant...
Page 28 sur 28
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0220DEC001191515
20 février 2018
purposes of drawing the public attention to poor quality of advice offered by private insurance brokers, the way in which the information was obtained and its veracity were also important factors ( Haldimann
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;FRA;FRE
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0701DEC002757504
1 juillet 2008
Cholet, Pascale Laborde, résidant à Cholet, Chantal Maillet, résidant à La Tessoualle, Sandrine Baudoin, résidant à Cholet, Martine Becquet, résidant à Cholet, Christine Lamothe, résidant à Cholet, Hafida
2ème Chambre
DTA_2102640_20231004
4 octobre 2023
l'arrêté du 29 mars 2021 par lequel la préfète de la Gironde a déclaré d'utilité publique les travaux de réalisation d'un bus à haut niveau de service sur les communes de Bordeaux, Mérignac, Eysines, Le Haillan
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0309JUD003653715
9 mars 2021
and opinions] always entails some duties and responsibilities, as does the exercise of any civil freedom, as the Court of Strasbourg regularly reiterates in this area (see, among other authorities, Haldimann
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0906DEC002644812
6 septembre 2016
Germany (no. 2) [GC], nos. 40660/08 and 60641/08, § 107, ECHR 2012; and, more recently, Haldimann and Others v. Switzerland , no. 21830/09, §§ 54 and 55, ECHR 2015). 58.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:1031JUD000960218
31 octobre 2023
necessary to impose on press organs an obligation to blur the image of an individual depicted in its publication (see, for example, Bremner , cited above, §§ 80 ‑ 85, and, mutatis mutandis , Haldimann
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0429JUD003963120
29 avril 2025
carried out in compliance with the criteria established by the Court’s case ‑ law, serious reasons are required for the Court to substitute its opinion for that of the domestic courts (see Haldimann
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0517DEC000859608
17 mai 2011
The Supreme Court allowed the appeal (Chief Justice Murray, Mrs Justice Denham and Mr Justice Fennelly in the majority, with Mr Justice Kearns and Mr Justice Hardiman dissenting).
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:1108JUD000278212
8 novembre 2018
That interference had also been “necessary in a democratic society”, according to the criteria established in the Court’s case-law (the Government cited Haldimann and Others v.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0910JUD003133306
10 septembre 2010
Fennelly J., Kearns J. and Geoghegan J. delivered separate judgments, with Hardiman J. and Macken J. concurring. 35.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0325JUD000186418
25 mars 2021
Spain [GC], nos. 28955/06 and 3 others, § 57, ECHR 2011; and, more recently, Haldimann and Others v. Switzerland , no. 21830/09, §§ 54-55, ECHR 2015).
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0701JUD000779616
1 juillet 2021
In that connection, the Court observes that in the case of Haldimann and Others v.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:1008JUD002795816
8 octobre 2024
28955/06 and 3 others, § 57, ECHR 2011; Haldimann and Others v. Switzerland , no. 21830/09, § 55, ECHR 2015; and Delfi AS v. Estonia [GC], no. 64569/09, § 139, ECHR 2015).
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:1105JUD007308717
5 novembre 2020
are required if it is to substitute its view for that of the domestic courts (see MGN Limited , cited above, §§ 150 and 155; Palomo Sánchez and Others , cited above, § 57; and, more recently, Haldimann
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0222JUD007256210
22 février 2018
Similarly, freedom of expression has been considered to include the broadcasting of videos (see Haldimann and Others v. Switzerland , no. 21830/09, ECHR 2015).
CASELAW;REPORTS;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1993:0708REP001813191
8 juillet 1993
vaatimuksia, voidaan hyväksyä, 1) jos hakija osoittaa, että hänen tai hänen esivanhempansa ovat aikaisemmin laillisesti käyttäneet hakijan
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:0314JUD004647799
14 mars 2002
Kieran Coonan QC, Recorder of the Crown Court, the other members of the panel consisting of Professor Bluglass (Emeritus Professor of Forensic Psychiatry at the University of Birmingham), Mr Gordon Halliday
CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1990:0213DEC001322887
13 février 1990
Halliday filed a further affidavit recommending permanent fostering of D. and E. without access by the applicant.