to personally return the child.

support his child.

The views of the child shall be given due weight in accordance with the age and maturity of the child. C.     Relevant international law 18.

    K.D.’s application for the return of the child 8.     On 1 March 2011 K.D. lodged an application with the Gryfice District Court for the return of the child.

child of a married couple: admissible Article 14 Discrimination Sex Alleged discrimination against natural father as regards his right of access to his child: admissible The applicant is the natural father

The assistance shall be provided in co-operation with the child and its parents or other carers (section 13 of the Child Welfare Act). 55.

The parents have neglected the child.

  The mother's post as a child-minder for a child is a temporary post while the ordinary employee is on maternity leave.

days the child had spent in Israel.

The child stayed with B. The applicant had regular contact with the child.

Objectives of child custody/curatorship: 1) to appoint for the child a guardian whose duty it will be to take care of the child, bring it up, to represent the child and protect its rights and legitimate

’s right of access to the child until 31 December 2011 (no. 313 F 283/99).

with the child. (2) The parents must refrain from everything that renders more difficult the relationship of the child to the other parent or the upbringing.

As a result, and even though the domestic authorities accepted that he had raised and cared for the child over a period of five years, he lost all parental rights in respect of the child, including the

However, the domestic courts restricted his parental authority over the child.

The assistance shall be provided in co-operation with the child and its parents or other carers (section 13 of the Child Welfare Act).

of the child within the family. 6.

On 27 December 1993, the Dortmund Labour Office informed the first applicant, who had received child benefits ( Kindergeld ) since 1986, that as from 1 January 1994 the child benefits would no longer be

The court based its judgment on the opinion of the child welfare service that the situation would take more time to resolve and until the child was helped to ease his anxieties about his father, it was