The applicant cannot be blamed for making use of available remedies.

They did however talk to S. who blamed the applicant for the conflict. He claimed that she had attacked him with scissors and that he had acted in self-defence. 6.

The measures taken against the applicant had not been the result of any blanket prohibition: each incident had been considered on its facts and in light of the applicant’s own history of offending.

As the purely compensatory remedy to which the Government referred would not have provided redress for the violations alleged, Mr Macready could not be blamed for failing to have used it.

  Russia [GC], 29580/12 et al., 15   November 2018, Legal Summary ; Advisory opinion concerning the use of the “blanket reference” or “legislation by reference” technique in the definition of

It was the applicant who apparently failed over many years to respond to these efforts in a meaningful manner, and the delays in the compensation procedure after 2001 or 2002 cannot therefore be blamed

The Court considered that such a blanket prohibition raised of itself an issue under Article 6§1 of the Convention.     I.

BLASSEL. Par jugement du 1er février 1996, le Conseil de Prud'Hommes de LILLE a dit que Monsieur Daniel A... avait bien démissionné de son poste de travail, condamné Monsieurr Y...

BLASSEL DEBATS :à l'audience publique du 21 Novembre 2006 ARRET :Contradictoire prononcé par sa mise à disposition au greffe le 31 Janvier 2007, les parties présentes en ayant été préalablement

BLASSEL COMPOSITION DE LA COUR LORS DU DELIBERE JG. HUGLO : PRESIDENT DE CHAMBRE P. RICHEZ : CONSEILLER C.

BLASSEL COMPOSITION DE LA COUR LORS DU DELIBERE JG. HUGLO : PRESIDENT DE CHAMBRE P. RICHEZ : CONSEILLER C.

BLASSEL, greffier lors du prononcé FAITS, PROCÉDURE, PRÉTENTIONS ET MOYENS DES PARTIES La SARL LOURDEL SN avait embauché M.

BLASSEL COMPOSITION DE LA COUR LORS DU DELIBERE JG. HUGLO : PRESIDENT DE CHAMBRE P. NOUBEL : CONSEILLER P.

BLASSEL, greffier auquel la minute de la décision a été remise par le magistrat signataire. Exposé du litige et prétentions respectives des parties M.

BLASSEL, greffier auquel la minute de la décision a été remise par le magistrat signataire.

BLASSEL, greffier auquel la minute de la décision a été remise par le magistrat signataire. Exposé du litige et prétentions respectives des parties M.

The Court reiterates that applicants cannot be blamed for taking full advantage of the resources and tools afforded by national law in the defence of their interests (see Kolomiyets v. Russia , no.

The Slovak authorities therefore could not be blamed for having carried out the preliminary investigation, despite the applicant having been previously granted refugee status in Sweden.