CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes
Exporter CSV

2 040 résultats pour « Alexandre LAMY »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CA

2ème chambre section A

686767017c03803a32c2721d

Appel

3 juillet 2025

3 juillet 2025

QUALICONSULT Copie exécutoire délivrée le à : Selarl LX SCP L'Hostis Selarl Favre de Thierrens Selarl Lamy Pomiès-Richaud Selarl Leonard Vezian COUR D'APPEL DE NÎMES

Source officielle

Page 28 sur 102

← PrécédentSuivant →
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:1030JUD001993604

Admin. suprême

30 octobre 2012

30 octobre 2012

The applicant was represented in those proceedings by his mother and his lawyers. 62.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0919DEC001277210

Admin. suprême

19 septembre 2023

19 septembre 2023

    The applicants were represented by Mr Giuseppe Ferraro, a lawyer practising in Naples. 3.     The Italian Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Mr L.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0205JUD004610811

Admin. suprême

5 février 2013

5 février 2013

    The applicant’s lawyers lodged a complaint with the St.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:1018JUD002283307

Admin. suprême

18 octobre 2011

18 octobre 2011

Bernhauser, a lawyer practising in Vienna. The Austrian Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Ambassador H.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:1213JUD002088309

Admin. suprême

13 décembre 2011

13 décembre 2011

had later on engaged the services of lawyer B.J.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-154431

Admin. suprême

15 avril 2015

15 avril 2015

    The applicant, Mr Aleksandre Manukian, is a Georgian national, who was born in 1965 and lives in Tbilisi. He is represented before the Court by Ms E.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0326DEC000414004

Admin. suprême

26 mars 2013

26 mars 2013

    The applicant, Mrs Aurelia Roman, is a Romanian national, who was born in 1960 and lives in Alexandria. She was represented before the Court by Mr S.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:1109DEC006958301

Admin. suprême

9 novembre 2004

9 novembre 2004

Glashev, lawyers practising in Moscow. The respondent Government are represented by Mr   P. Laptev, Representative of the Russian Federation at the European Court of Human Rights.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:0608DEC005732100

Admin. suprême

8 juin 2004

8 juin 2004

Strnad, a lawyer practising in the Czech Republic. The respondent Government were represented by their Agent, Mr   V.   Schorm. A.

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;HEARINGS;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-1605340-1680929

Admin. suprême

2 mars 2006

2 mars 2006

the commission asked her to hand over the file she had brought with her in preparation, which contained a series of documents including personal notes about her defence and recommendations from her lawyer

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:1019DEC007205901

Admin. suprême

19 octobre 2004

19 octobre 2004

Balík, a lawyer practising in Prague. The respondent Government were represented by their Agent, Mr   V. A. Schorm. A.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-140874

Admin. suprême

3 juillet 2013

3 juillet 2013

to undertake any measures in order to summon the child protection authority, or to secure the presence of a representative of the Public Ministry at the hearings or the appointment of an ex officio lawyer

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:1022JUD005042308

Admin. suprême

22 octobre 2020

22 octobre 2020

The presiding judge stated that they had once again tried to contact the lawyers.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:1205JUD002298009

Admin. suprême

5 décembre 2013

5 décembre 2013

    The first applicant is a lawyer practising in Slatina. He was admitted to the Croatian Ba r on 1 April 2003. 7.

Source officielle
CA

3e Chambre B

6032e6aaebff3d5abd1f89c0

Appel

9 novembre 2017

9 novembre 2017

SPTMI Phocéenne de Travaux, les lames à changer.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:0208DEC004090798

Admin. suprême

8 février 2000

8 février 2000

The Government describe the conditions in Alexandras as being the same as Drapetsona.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0116DEC006063316

Admin. suprême

16 janvier 2018

16 janvier 2018

Paoletti, lawyers practising in Rome. A.     The circumstances of the case 2.     The facts of the case, as submitted by the applicants, may be summarised as follows. 3.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:1016JUD004016004

Admin. suprême

16 octobre 2014

16 octobre 2014

Torov, a lawyer practising in Štip. The Macedonian Government (“the Government”) were initially represented by their former Agent, Mrs R.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0116DEC005082106

Admin. suprême

16 janvier 2018

16 janvier 2018

Guiso, a lawyer practising in Nuoro. A.     The circumstances of the case 2.     The facts of the case, as submitted by the applicants, may be summarised as follows. 3.

Source officielle