The Government submitted declarations with a view to resolving the issues raised by these complaints. They further requested the Court to strike out the applications.

an effective remedy for grievances similar to those of the applicant, allowing him to have the violation of the Convention acknowledged, either explicitly or in substance, and to receive adequate and

The creditors’ request to have the bailiff’s rulings set aside in order to discontinue the enforcement proceedings was therefore dismissed. 7.

    However, the applicants either ceased to be held in conditions that were allegedly contrary to the Convention before 13 January 2021 (application no. 20203/17) or continue to be held in such

  Failure to provide assistance to a person in a life-threatening condition (case no. 1266) 14.

    The Court, as the master of the characterisation to be given in law to the facts of the case, considers that this complaint falls to be examined under the procedural limb of Article 2 (see

According to the Court’s case-law, this situation is unacceptable.

B. helping him to gain access to the Council.” [...] 4.   “Rise with the help of the PSD.

    Regard being had to the documents in its possession and to its case ‑ law (see, in particular, Rezmiveș and Others, cited above), the Court considers it reasonable to award the sums

They limited their claims to 2018, the applicants having instituted proceedings before the Rent Regulation Board in 2019 consequent to amendments to the Ordinance ( see Cauchi v. Malta , no.

    The Court reiterates that it has constantly held that disciplinary proceedings in which the right to continue to exercise a profession is at stake give rise to “contestations” (disputes)

They further complain that the authorities have failed to inform them of the risks to their health that they were exposed to by living in the area surrounding the landfill.

, such as an endorsement, a fact which she considered an impediment to the right to work.

to display a correspondingly greater degree of tolerance to criticism. 17.

    Having regard to the similar subject matter of the applications, the Court finds it appropriate to examine them jointly in a single judgment.

On 1   February   2018 the applicant was notified of the opinion and given ten days to reply, pursuant to Article   417 of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

to clean up her own bodily fluids. 10.

THE LAW    Joinder of the applications Having regard to the similar subject matter of the applications, the Court finds it appropriate to examine them jointly in a single decision.

to be the legal successor to the SFRY.