CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
Chambre des référés
S.C. POMMEc/S.A
686c219edd7001754d61f98d
3 juillet 2025
[Localité 7] TRAVEL NETWORK, le L’AN DEUX MIL VINGT CINQ ET LE TROIS JUILLET À 14 H 00 Nous, Solange LEBAILE, Première Vice-Présidente, assistée de Monsieur Thibaut LLEU, Greffier, lors de l’audience
Page 27 sur 252
67f81da1cf40727a00440fd0
9 avril 2025
SANTE Expédition délivrée à Me Stéphane GIANQUINTO Me Firas RABHI Me Luisella RAMOINO Partie défaillante (1) le l’an deux mil vingt cinq et le neuf Avril à 14 H 00 Nous, Solange LEBAILE
679a9135e9a46d1f5a765efd
10 janvier 2025
sis [Adresse 2] c/ [J] [T], [H] [T] Grosse délivrée à Me BRICE-TREHIN Expédition délivrée à Me FRAPECH le l’an deux mil vingt cinq et le dix Janvier à 14 H 00 Nous, Solange LEBAILE
12e chambre
65449d9cc71a6a83181c8fce
2 novembre 2023
IRIDIS [Adresse 2] [Adresse 2] [Adresse 2] Représentant : Me Mélina PEDROLETTI, Postulant, avocat au barreau de VERSAILLES, vestiaire : 626 Représentant : Me Marie-sarah LEBAILE, Plaidant, avocat
Chambre 4-6
5fd97a2bd6aee568568437b4
24 janvier 2020
L'affaire a été débattue le 12 Novembre 2019 en audience publique devant la Cour composée de : Madame Christine LORENZINI, Présidente de Chambre Monsieur Thierry CABALE, Conseiller Mme Solange LEBAILE
Chambre 4-8
5fda3496365c1b7a92e1cc60
13 septembre 2019
magistrat a rendu compte des plaidoiries dans le délibéré de la Cour composée de : Madame Marie-Pierre SAINTE, Conseiller faisant fonction de Président Monsieur Yann CATTIN, Conseiller Mme Solange LEBAILE
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:1026JUD002052008
26 octobre 2010
The court was of the view that applications for leave served the purpose of making access to the Supreme Court for legally-aided parties genuine and effective.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:1119JUD006554613
19 novembre 2020
When legal aid had been granted and the time-limit for the submission of a cassation appeal had already expired, it was open to the legally-aided party to submit the appeal together with
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0706JUD001703804
6 juillet 2010
On the contrary, the situation which all parties had already considered as legal would have been legally confirmed.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:1202JUD002775605
2 décembre 2014
He may not be held legally responsible for opinions expressed in the exercise of his mandate’.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:1005JUD003485107
5 octobre 2010
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-160392
7 janvier 2016
He is not legally represented. The applicant is the father of Mr Magomed Kabilov, who was born in 1984.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:1011JUD002398705
11 octobre 2011
When legal aid has been granted and the time-limit for the submission of a cassation appeal has already expired, it is open to the legally-aided party to submit the appeal together with a
PRESS;GENERAL;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-592110-596288
25 juillet 2002
presidente general consejero togado ), R.G. and L.M., ( vocales togados generales auditores ), set aside part of the order charging the applicant, holding that the charge should be misappropriating legally
ECLI:CEDH:003-640343-645886
31 octobre 2002
decisions violated his right to respect for his private and family life and that Austria was bound by an agreement between the European Union and Turkey, which granted Turkish workers who had been legally
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:1122DEC000895111
22 novembre 2016
It was decided that a divorce was not legally permitted in their case.
CASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-2103
27 mars 2008
After deliberations lasting ten minutes the district court declared him legally incapable under Article 29 of the Civil Code, which prescribed such a measure if a person could not understand the meaning
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:0722JUD005252999
22 juillet 2003
His dementia and other age-related illnesses had not been accepted as a legally valid excuse for his failure to attend the Court of Appeal’s hearing.
CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-69952
18 juillet 2005
measures The covert surveillance at issue in these cases was not in accordance with the law, as the rules regulating this kind of surveillance at the time (the Home Office Guidelines) were neither legally
ECLI:CEDH:001-167916
29 septembre 2016
It also held that the applicant, who had been a witness in the criminal case against D.A., was not legally entitled to ask the court to remove from the judgment the reasoning which had been the basis for