During their questioning the witnesses reiterated their statements excluding the possibility that the applicant had been in Petrinja at the time of the events. 29.

The crew were confined to their quarters under military guard. On instructions from the French authorities, a tug was sent out to tow the Winner into Brest harbour.

As regards the second assertion of the Government, considering that the applicant is the legitimate heir of her mother N.B., the Court dismisses the Government’s preliminary objection in this respect.

This payment will constitute the final resolution of the case”.

  The Court found that, whilst it was well aware that the requisite promptness in such a case must not hinder the efforts of judges and prosecutors to perform their duties with due care, the length

This degree of consistency between the testimonies of the applicant and his co-accused raise suspicions that their accounts had been carefully coordinated.

Superwood was therefore entitled to its re-trial costs only up to the date of the lodgements and, consistently, the first three insurers were entitled to their costs from the date of their lodgements.

    The Court notes that this complaint is not manifestly ill-founded within the meaning of Article 35 § 3 (a) of the Convention.

Their statements concerning the circumstances of the abduction were similar to the account submitted to the Court.

the Act was inapplicable in their case. 22.

For the same reason their complaint under Article 5 § 5 must be declared admissible. 45.     The Court therefore dismisses this objection of the Government.

it has not had the effect of bringing this part of the land thus removed from the action of the tide outside the category of maritime public property.

and that the use of force and handcuffing had thus been lawful and justified in the circumstances.

In 2002–03 courts upheld this decision. 13.     On 2 June 2004 the command offered the applicant a flat in Moscow. On 25 February 2005 the applicant accepted this offer.

The command corps of the operation had assisted the villagers to leave the village and to remove their possessions.

    Based on this contract, the applicants and D.M. duly registered their ownership of the properties with the land registry. 21.

The Austrian Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Ambassador   H.

In its view, this amount would constitute adequate redress and sufficient compensation for the violation of the Convention thus a reasonable sum as to quantum in the present case in the light of the Court

On 13   December 2001 the court disjoined this claim from the first set. 10.