attaquée en date du 27 Mars 2013, enregistrée sous le no F 12/ 00485 ARRÊT DU 02 Février 2016 APPELANTE : Madame Sophie X... ... 49300 CHOLET comparante-assistée de Maître Richard WETZEL

Austria , cited above, § 41; Willis v. the United Kingdom , no. 36042/97, §§ 32-34, ECHR 2002-IV; Wessels-Bergervoet v. the Netherlands (dec.), no. 34462/97, 3   October 2000; Koua Poirrez v.

WESSELS-BERGERVOET against the Netherlands     The European Court of Human Rights (First Section), sitting on 3 October 2000 as a Chamber composed of     Mrs   E.

Wenzel, du ministère fédéral de la Justice. 4.     Les faits de l’espèce, tels qu’exposés par les parties, peuvent se résumer comme suit. LA GENÈSE DE L’AFFAIRE 5.

Il fut rappelé que le requérant n'avait pas encore prêté serment et qu'en conséquence il n'avait pas demandé son inscription (er weze herinnerd dat de heer De Moor op dit ogenblik zijn eed nog niet afgelegd

  Wenzel, of the Federal Ministry of Justice. 4.     The facts of the case may be summarised as follows.

  Wolfgang Sturmhöfel of the same Ministry,         and Staatsanwalt Joachim Wenzel of the Frankfurt Public         Prosecutor's

welfare system and thus involving issues of social and economic strategy (see, for example, Van Raalte v. the Netherlands , judgment of 21 February 1997, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1997-I; Wessels-Bergervoet

  40892/98, § 42, ECHR 2003-X; Wessels-Bergervoet v. the Netherlands , no. 34462/97, ECHR 2002-IV; Van den Bouwhuijsen and Schuring v. the Netherlands (dec.), no. 44658/98, 16 December 2003).

  Wenzel, of the Federal Ministry of Justice and Consumer Protection. 4.     The facts of the case may be summarised as follows.

Greece [GC], no. 34369/97, § 44, ECHR   2000-IV, and Wessels-Bergervoet v. the Netherlands , no. 34462/97, § 46, ECHR 2002-IV). 101.

Wenzel, of the Federal Ministry of Justice. The circumstances of the case 4.     The facts of the case may be summarised as follows.      Background to the case 5 .

  Wenzel, of the Federal Ministry of Justice. 4.     The facts of the case may be summarised as follows. THE DEMONSTRATION 5.

Wenzel, of the Federal Ministry of Justice. 4.     The facts of the case may be summarised as follows. I.

She relied on the Court’s finding in Wessels ‑ Bergervoet v. the Netherlands , no. 34462/97, § 51, ECHR 2002 ‑ IV, that the traditional role of men as breadwinners did not provide objective

  Wenzel, of the Federal Ministry of Justice and Consumer Protection. 4.     The facts of the case, as submitted by the parties, may be summarised as follows. Background to the case 5.

  Wenzel, of the Federal Ministry of Justice and Consumer Protection. 4.     The facts of the case may be summarised as follows. 5 .