AND · OR · NOT · "…"CodexAI
AND · OR · NOT · "…"DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0919DEC000125015
19 septembre 2023
19 septembre 2023
Pâcleşan, a lawyer practising in Bucharest; the decision to give notice of the application to the Romanian Government (“the Government”), represented by their Agent, Ms O.F.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0614DEC001261103
14 juin 2005
14 juin 2005
Also, it would not be unreasonable to expect Esther to move to her mother in Shinyanga, where, allegedly, she had lived for most of her life.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:1104DEC004082721
4 novembre 2025
4 novembre 2025
Danciu, a lawyer practising in Baia Mare; the decision to give notice of the complaint concerning access to a court under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention to the Romanian Government (“the Government
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2026:0127DEC003489121
27 janvier 2026
27 janvier 2026
It is, however, open to applicants to contend that a law violates their rights, in the absence of an individual measure of implementation, if they belong to a class of people who risk being directly affected
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0710DEC007056210
10 juillet 2018
10 juillet 2018
The sums referred to above, which are specified in the appendix to the decision, are to cover any pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage as well as costs and expenses, will be free of any taxes that may be
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0507DEC004586622
7 mai 2025
7 mai 2025
Having regard to the declarations submitted by the respondent Government requesting the Court to strike the applications out of the list of cases, Having regard to the observations submitted by the respondent
Source officielleCASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0826JUD004119222
26 août 2025
26 août 2025
On 22 March 2021, the investigators requested that the applicant be subjected to a forensic psychologic evaluation in order to determine his ability to accurately perceive the circumstances
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0905DEC003574519
5 septembre 2023
5 septembre 2023
with a view to resolving the issue raised by the application.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0923DEC003607022
23 septembre 2025
23 septembre 2025
The examination of the DNA’s appeal was assigned to a panel of judges, which included C.N.I. 5. The applicants asked for the case to be transferred to a different court of appeal.
Source officielleCASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0328JUD005879816
28 mars 2024
28 mars 2024
Regard being had to the documents in its possession and to its case ‑ law (see, in particular, Rezmiveș and Others, cited above), the Court considers it reasonable to award the sums
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2026:0331DEC004596521
31 mars 2026
31 mars 2026
1 as regards the question whether the domestic proceedings afforded the applicant a reasonable opportunity to put his case to the authorities in order to effectively challenge the measure in question
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:1002DEC000556716
2 octobre 2025
2 octobre 2025
to freedom of expression and right to freedom of assembly. 16.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0121DEC002669919
21 janvier 2025
21 janvier 2025
1 to the Convention. 17.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0507DEC004587322
7 mai 2025
7 mai 2025
THE LAW Joinder of the applications Having regard to the similar subject matter of the applications, the Court finds it appropriate to examine them jointly in a single decision.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2026:0303DEC005435220
3 mars 2026
3 mars 2026
out to be the same thing.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:1126DEC000338821
26 novembre 2024
26 novembre 2024
trial to the Bucharest District Court. 4.
Source officielleCASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:1023JUD005618115
23 octobre 2025
23 octobre 2025
Ms O. admitted that the truck was still in her possession but refused to give any details, referring to her right not to self-incriminate. 6 .
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:1016DEC002919515
16 octobre 2025
16 octobre 2025
1 to the Convention.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0704DEC003521523
4 juillet 2024
4 juillet 2024
own terms and the right to access to a court, in addition to the right to liberty.
Source officielleCASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0630JUD002580304
30 juin 2009
30 juin 2009
impair or to destroy the system of liberties or to hinder the democratic system or to put an end to it by means of the conduct referred to in section 9.’
Source officiellePage 26 sur 44