CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
Exporter CSV
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes

868 résultats pour « Sebastien TO »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0919DEC000125015

Admin. suprême

19 septembre 2023

19 septembre 2023

Pâcleşan, a lawyer practising in Bucharest; the decision to give notice of the application to the Romanian Government (“the Government”), represented by their Agent, Ms O.F.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0614DEC001261103

Admin. suprême

14 juin 2005

14 juin 2005

Also, it would not be unreasonable to expect Esther to move to her mother in Shinyanga, where, allegedly, she had lived for most of her life.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:1104DEC004082721

Admin. suprême

4 novembre 2025

4 novembre 2025

Danciu, a lawyer practising in Baia Mare; the decision to give notice of the complaint concerning access to a court under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention to the Romanian Government (“the   Government

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2026:0127DEC003489121

Admin. suprême

27 janvier 2026

27 janvier 2026

It is, however, open to applicants to contend that a law violates their rights, in the absence of an individual measure of implementation, if they belong to a class of people who risk being directly affected

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0710DEC007056210

Admin. suprême

10 juillet 2018

10 juillet 2018

The sums referred to above, which are specified in the appendix to the decision, are to cover any pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage as well as costs and expenses, will be free of any taxes that may be

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0507DEC004586622

Admin. suprême

7 mai 2025

7 mai 2025

Having regard to the declarations submitted by the respondent Government requesting the Court to strike the applications out of the list of cases, Having regard to the observations submitted by the respondent

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0826JUD004119222

Admin. suprême

26 août 2025

26 août 2025

    On 22 March 2021, the investigators requested that the applicant be subjected to a forensic psychologic evaluation in order to determine his ability to accurately perceive the circumstances

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0905DEC003574519

Admin. suprême

5 septembre 2023

5 septembre 2023

with a view to resolving the issue raised by the application.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0923DEC003607022

Admin. suprême

23 septembre 2025

23 septembre 2025

The examination of the DNA’s appeal was assigned to a panel of judges, which included C.N.I. 5.     The applicants asked for the case to be transferred to a different court of appeal.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0328JUD005879816

Admin. suprême

28 mars 2024

28 mars 2024

    Regard being had to the documents in its possession and to its case ‑ law (see, in particular, Rezmiveș and Others, cited above), the Court considers it reasonable to award the sums

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2026:0331DEC004596521

Admin. suprême

31 mars 2026

31 mars 2026

  1 as regards the question whether the domestic proceedings afforded the applicant a reasonable opportunity to put his case to the authorities in order to effectively challenge the measure in question

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:1002DEC000556716

Admin. suprême

2 octobre 2025

2 octobre 2025

to freedom of expression and right to freedom of assembly. 16.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0121DEC002669919

Admin. suprême

21 janvier 2025

21 janvier 2025

  1 to the Convention. 17.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0507DEC004587322

Admin. suprême

7 mai 2025

7 mai 2025

THE LAW Joinder of the applications Having regard to the similar subject matter of the applications, the Court finds it appropriate to examine them jointly in a single decision.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2026:0303DEC005435220

Admin. suprême

3 mars 2026

3 mars 2026

out to be the same thing.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:1126DEC000338821

Admin. suprême

26 novembre 2024

26 novembre 2024

trial to the Bucharest District Court. 4.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:1023JUD005618115

Admin. suprême

23 octobre 2025

23 octobre 2025

Ms O. admitted that the truck was still in her possession but refused to give any details, referring to her right not to self-incriminate. 6 .

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:1016DEC002919515

Admin. suprême

16 octobre 2025

16 octobre 2025

  1 to the Convention.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0704DEC003521523

Admin. suprême

4 juillet 2024

4 juillet 2024

own terms and the right to access to a court, in addition to the right to liberty.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0630JUD002580304

Admin. suprême

30 juin 2009

30 juin 2009

impair or to destroy the system of liberties or to hinder the democratic system or to put an end to it by means of the conduct referred to in section 9.’

Source officielle

Page 26 sur 44

← PrécédentSuivant →