CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0430DEC003323512
30 avril 2013
It was also decided to grant priority to the application under Rule 41 of the Rules of Court.
Page 26 sur 2215
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:0321JUD002528394
21 mars 2000
24 § 4 of the Rules of Court), withdrew from sitting in the Chamber, having taken part in the Commission’s examination of the case (Rule 28).
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0925DEC001709207
25 septembre 2012
Rules 45 and 47 of the Rules of Court read, in the relevant parts, as follows: Rule 45 - Signatures “1.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:1016JUD002971511
16 octobre 2025
81 of the Rules of the Court and a request for revision within the meaning of Rule 80 of the Rules of the Court.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2026:0205DEC000927619
5 février 2026
The purpose of the rule on exhaustion of domestic remedies is to afford the Contracting States the opportunity of preventing or putting right the violations alleged against them before those allegations
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:0129DEC005672100
29 janvier 2002
The rules have been subsequently amended, but the 1973 and 1978 rules as described above are still in force and the complaints in this application relate to those rules.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:1006JUD004629819
6 octobre 2022
Rules of Court (for further details see the appended table).
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-184730
26 juin 2018
It should be read together with Rule 23. ” 2.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:1205JUD003336996
5 décembre 2000
; 62 § 3 of the Rules of Court). 20.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:1205JUD003185396
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:1205JUD003364596
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1998:0730JUD002729595
30 juillet 1998
Thus, the Portuguese Government requests that the case be struck out of the list in accordance with Rule [51] § 2 of Rules of Court [B].”
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:1103DEC002145914
3 novembre 2015
They further requested the issue of an interim measure within the meaning of Rule 39 of the Rules of Court. 19.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1996:1016DEC002337194
16 octobre 1996
2 to have the time-limit for filing an application under Order 33 Rule 5 extended.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;SCREENINGPANEL;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-31
15 mai 1996
26 of Rules of Court B (2), _______________ Notes by the Registrar 1.
CASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-7008
30 mai 2000
The requirement of lawfulness meant that rules of domestic law had to be sufficiently accessible, precise and foreseeable.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0823DEC007528510
23 août 2011
39 of the Rules of Court and the fact that this interim measure has been complied with, Having regard to the decision to grant priority to the above application under Rule 41 of the Rules of Court, Having
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0823DEC005297510
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0823DEC005348210
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:1127DEC002540412
27 novembre 2012
39 of the Rules of Court prior to enforcement of a deportation decision.