It follows that this part of the application cannot be dismissed as being manifestly ill-founded within the meaning of Article 27 para. 2 (Art. 27-2) of the Convention.

They are clearly political in nature and are characteristic of a political party, whose registration is to be carried out under the Political Parties Act [of 1990].”

    The parties' submissions The Government submitted that this complaint was inadmissible for failure to exhaust domestic remedies.

The police accused the applicant of using his companies to the prejudice of his business partners.

A hearing in the presence of all the parties was conducted on 26 July 1999.

    Complaints under Article 5 of the Convention The applicant made several complaints falling under Article 5 of the Convention, the relevant part of which provides: “1.

    Complaints under Article 5 §§ 3-5 of the Convention The applicant made several complaints falling under Article 5 of the Convention, the relevant part of which provides: “3.

The relevant part of Article 8 of the Convention provides: “1.     Everyone has the right to respect for ... his home ... 2.

    The circumstances of the case The facts of the case, as submitted by the parties, may be summarised as follows. The first two applicants are spouses.

    The circumstances of the case The facts of the case, as submitted by the parties, may be summarised as follows.

consequences of that party’s acts or failures to act.

    The circumstances of the case The facts of the case, as submitted by the parties, may be summarised as follows. 1.

The respondent parties challenged that decision. 69.

Partly admissible;Partly inadmissible

    The circumstances of the case The facts of the case, as submitted by the parties, may be summarised as follows. 1.

years of working abroad: admissible The applicant entered Latvian territory in 1954, at the age of 12, at a time when the territory was one of the fifteen “Soviet Socialist Republics” and hence de facto part

    The facts of the case, as submitted by the parties, may be summarised as follows. 1. Background information on rent control 3.

    The facts of the case, as submitted by the parties, may be summarised as follows. 1.     Background information on the control of rent 3.

    The facts of the case, as submitted by the parties, may be summarised as follows. 1.     Background information on rent control 3.

Siman of EL Partners, s.r.o. in Bratislava. The Government of the Slovak Republic (“the   Government”) were represented by their Agent, Ms M. Pirošíková. A.