Conditional discharge Under section 73(2) of the Act, where a MHRT is satisfied as to either of the matters referred to at (a), but not as to the matter referred to at (b), of the above section

The principle of necessity may apply.

    In early May a summons to appear for military service on 15 May 2001 was delivered to the applicant’s home.

    The circumstances of the case The facts of the case, as submitted by the parties, may be summarised as follows.

Three other Ashraf families were living in Tuulo Nuh; they were treated in the same manner. 8.

    The applicant was born in 1965 and lives in Baia Mare. He was represented before the Court by Ms I.-R. Muscan, a lawyer practising in Baia Mare. 2.

It may be subject to editorial revision.   In the case of M.C. and A.C. v.

The Guidelines on End of Life Care issued by the Swiss Academy of Medical Sciences on 25 November 2004 acknowledge that, in borderline cases, a doctor may be faced with an ‘intractable conflict’ (point

Election campaign expenses and political advertising expenses incurred before the start of the election campaign must be declared in the manner prescribed by law and may not exceed the maximum permissible

It may not take long. Or the change may not occur for a long time - I do not know how it will work out. ...

It may be subject to editorial revision. In the case of Elezi v.

Elders and deacons were in charge of spiritual welfare, guided the community’s worship, provided social assistance, celebrated mass, baptisms, marriages and funerals, and supervised missionary work.

    On 24 May 2002 the Surgut Town Court declined to examine the first applicant’s and his lawyer’s complaints, noting that it did not have territorial jurisdiction over the matter.

Elders and deacons were in charge of spiritual welfare, guided the community’s worship, provided social assistance, celebrated mass, baptisms, marriages and funerals, and supervised missionary work.

The manner of conduct of such an investigation must necessarily involve a variety of decisions to be made on matters of policy and discretion, for example as to which particular line of inquiry is most

It may be subject to editorial revision.   In the case of Arnar Helgi Lárusson v.

and a woman” was not met since the couple did not include a man.

    On 24 May 1999 the MHRT first considered her application.

On 11 May 1988 the Court of Appeal rejected the appeal for being out of time, since it had been lodged more than three weeks after 24 December 1987.