Thus, at this stage it was impossible to determine the actual boundaries of the property and in this state of uncertainty it was not surprising that the applicants had not taken up the procedure before

The Ukrainian Government (“the Government”) were represented by Mr. Y.   Zaytsev, their Agent. A.

They contested the remainder of the applicant’s claims under this head. 40.

conditions and in accordance with the procedures provided for by this Law, which guarantees the rights of all the persons concerned, including those of the subject thus conceived.”

In its view, this amount would constitute adequate redress and sufficient compensation for the impugned length of the said proceedings, and thus a reasonable sum as to quantum in the present case in the

The Court further noted that this lack of information had continued after the accident of January 2000, despite the probable anxiety of the local people.

    The Croatian Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Ms Š. Stažnik. A.     The circumstances of the case 3.

Milinchuk, former Representative of the Russian Federation at the European Court of Human Rights, and subsequently by their Representative, Mr G. Matyushkin.

The Ukrainian Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Mr Yuriy Zaytsev. The facts of the case, as submitted by the parties, may be summarised as follows.

    Principal facts   The applicants, Isabelle M.

on the merits of their claim.

The other applicants were injured during the flooding and their mental health was also affected by their tragic experience on the campsite.

Companies must, at the latest within the time-limit for bringing their bylaws in line with this Act [that is, until 31 December 1995], apply to the [relevant commercial] court to have those business units

The applicants are all Serbian nationals, and their further personal details are set out in the Annex to this judgment. 2.     The applicants were represented by Mr S.

    Length of proceedings The applicants complain that the length of proceedings in their cases was incompatible with the reasonable time requirement provided in Article 6 § 1 of the Convention

... (3)     Prohibitions referred to in paragraph 1 of this section shall be considered effective from [the moment] of their service on the person concerned, or submission to the land registry

The courts had thus surrendered their function of reviewing the exercise of the executive’s discretion and the lawfulness of its actions, thereby depriving the applicants of the minimum degree of protection

He also alleged that the domestic courts had erred in their assessment of the facts and in the application of the law in convicting him.

While extending the applicants’ detention the domestic courts relied on the existence of a reasonable suspicion of their involvement in crimes, the vulnerability of the victims, the complexity of the criminal