Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"CodexAI
AND · OR · NOT · "…"DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0201DEC001658820
1 février 2022
1 février 2022
Having made an overall assessment, the High Court considered that unconditional expulsion with a permanent re-entry ban would not be in breach of Article 8 the Convention. 10.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0324DEC001356613
24 mars 2015
24 mars 2015
On 11 December 2012 the High Court refused the application for an adjournment.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0711DEC000027720
11 juillet 2023
11 juillet 2023
On 24 April 2019 the High Court concurred with the Board. 8. On 21 June 2019 the Supreme Court refused the applicants leave to appeal against the High Court’s judgment. 9.
Source officielleCASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0531JUD000904204
31 mai 2007
31 mai 2007
The High Court hearing took place between 1 and 23 October 2002. The High Court took oral evidence from the first applicant and from Mr R.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:1210DEC001995420
10 décembre 2020
10 décembre 2020
The High Court concluded in the negative on both points.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-250467
6 mai 2026
6 mai 2026
The High Court determined that the defence enjoyed access to the same material available to the prosecutor, namely that held by Kripos.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0306DEC000623906
6 mars 2007
6 mars 2007
HMA 2003 JC 153 was decided in the High Court of Justiciary.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-115512
26 novembre 2012
26 novembre 2012
Legal proceedings initiated by the applicant in connection with his alleged exposure to high-frequency radiation On 12 October 2008, while the applicant was serving his sentence in
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;FRA;FRE
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:0125DEC003497997
25 janvier 2000
25 janvier 2000
En ce qui concerne le grief tiré par le requérant de l’article 5 § 1 de la Convention, la décision définitive était celle rendue par la High Court le 14 février 1996.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-224302
5 avril 2023
5 avril 2023
The High Court acknowledged that there were “serious triable issues” but refused to grant the applicant’s request for interim relief, since it assumed that Rwanda would comply with the APA and, in any
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0329DEC001780320
29 mars 2022
29 mars 2022
By a judgment of 26 June 2019, the High Court upheld the District Court’s judgment.
Source officielleCASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0908JUD000781204
8 septembre 2011
8 septembre 2011
On 1 July 1989 the High Court hearing began.
Source officiellePRESS;GENERAL;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-553268-555154
28 mai 2002
28 mai 2002
The High Court applied a test based on whether there had been a real danger of injustice as a result of bias, and found that there had not.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-173367
10 avril 2017
10 avril 2017
On 25 April 2012 the applicant’s pre-trial detention was extended by the Budapest High Court until 26 June 2012.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0901DEC002348612
1 septembre 2015
1 septembre 2015
Everyone convicted of a criminal offence by a tribunal shall have the right to have his conviction or sentence reviewed by a higher tribunal.
Source officielleCASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0122JUD000024707
22 janvier 2009
22 janvier 2009
On 29 June 1995, alleging malpractice, the applicant instituted civil proceedings before the High Court of Eastern Denmark ( Østre Landsret - hereafter the High Court) against the medical
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:1114DEC004618416
14 novembre 2017
14 novembre 2017
In 2013 it paid a high wages tax surcharge of EUR 593,472. 45.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:1218DEC006955810
18 décembre 2012
18 décembre 2012
On 15 May 2010 the applicant’s solicitors contacted the High Court duty judge (it was a Saturday).
Source officielleCASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2026:0305JUD005313020
5 mars 2026
5 mars 2026
On 10 July 2019 he was placed in provisional extradition detention by the Budapest High Court. 4.
Source officielleCJUE
ECLI:EU:C:2011:43
3 février 2011
3 février 2011
#Wnioski o wydanie orzeczenia w trybie prejudycjalnym: High Court of Justice (England & Wales), Chancery Division (C-403/08), High Court of Justice (England & Wales), Queen’s Bench Division (Administrative
Source officiellePage 26 sur 1366