CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-151143
15 janvier 2015
On 20 December 2007 the High Court in Celle dismissed M.K.’s appeal and ordered the return of the child to Poland. However, the court conceded that the child need not be handed over to the applicant.
Page 26 sur 385
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0424JUD004652414
24 avril 2018
the child in an intolerable situation.”
CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1998:0701DEC003498697
1 juillet 1998
Central Appeals Tribunal, according to which a child may be considered as a foster child where it is maintained and cared for by foster parents as their own child.
ECLI:CEDH:001-158644
14 octobre 2015
Where this is not possible, the child should be placed in public care.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0207DEC000792120
7 février 2023
By virtue of section 14 of the Maintenance of Children Act, child maintenance is fixed, in the best interests of the child, as standard amounts as set out in section 14 of the Child Allowance
ECLI:CEDH:001-156351
29 juin 2015
The child continued to live with the applicant.
ECLI:CEDH:001-155303
18 mai 2015
A court may deprive a parent of parental authority if he or she avoids the parental obligations, such as the obligation to pay child maintenance; refuses to collect the child from the maternity hospital
ECLI:CEDH:001-163404
4 mai 2016
It agreed that the child the applicant had cared for had had disability status.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0417JUD000080509
17 avril 2012
the applicant to pay monthly child support.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0610JUD003578922
10 juin 2025
Article 4 Principles of child protection work “In child protection work, those arrangements shall be made which may be expected to be best for the child.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:0429JUD005667300
29 avril 2003
Finally, on 18 June 2000 the first applicant was able to recover her child with police assistance on A.U.A.’s return to Vigo with the child.
ECLI:CEDH:001-175333
16 juin 2017
Following her return to Finland in August 2013, I.K. instituted proceedings with a view to having the child returned to Finland under the 1980 Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child
ECLI:CEDH:001-157717
11 septembre 2015
return of the child.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0703DEC005669309
3 juillet 2012
The applicant contacted the child welfare authorities in order to have contact with the mother and the child, but in vain. 6.
PRESS;GENERAL;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-745898-758695
The first applicant was awarded custody of the child, while the father was granted access.
ECLI:CEDH:001-198862
6 novembre 2019
moved with the child to live in the town of Vynnyky, Lviv Region. The applicant instituted civil proceedings, claiming that I. prevented him from having access to the child.
5e chambre civile
67f603f1ebd728244385672a
8 avril 2025
TRANSPORTS CHILA [Adresse 8] [Adresse 8] [Localité 4] Représentée par Me Romain GEOFFROY de la SELARL ORA, avocat au barreau de MONTPELLIER, avocat postulant non plaidant Le HUIT AVRIL DEUX MILLE
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1988:0309DEC001240286
9 mars 1988
to visit the child together.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1987:0708JUD000984082
8 juillet 1987
(a) Reception of a child into care 37.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1993:1013DEC001738390
13 octobre 1993
is that a child shall be with its natural parents.