The court considered that these two witnesses did not see by themselves any of the events and that their impression of the applicant’s guilt was determined by the bus driver, G., who blamed the applicant

Islande , 25 juin 1992, § 63, série A n o 239A, et Bladet Tromsø et Stensaas c.   Norvège [GC], n o 21980/93, § 62, CEDH 1999 ‑ III). 26.

conteste pas (pour des exemples d’affaires dans lesquelles des rédacteurs en chef ont été condamnés à raison de publications parues dans les journaux pour lesquels ils travaillaient voir, parmi d’autres, Bladet

Royaume-Uni , arrêt du 27   mars 1996, Recueil 1996-II, p. 500, § 39, et Bladet Tromsø et Stensaas c.   Norvège [GC], n o 21980/93, § 59, CEDH 1999-III).

  Bladet Tromsø and Stensaas v. Norway [GC], no. 21980/93, ECHR 1999 ‑ III; Długołęcki v. Poland , no. 23806/03, 24 February 2009 Dalban v.

He was placed in a crowded, damp corridor near a toilet where he was required to lie on the cold, concrete floor with only a blanket.

    The judges further held that the blanket prohibition in section 2(1) of the 1961 Act was compatible with Article 8.

The beds had very dirty mattresses and no bed linen or blankets were provided. The cell was infested with pests and insects.

One of the police officers helped put out the fire by throwing a blanket and a carpet on Chichek Mammadova. 47.

There were two beds with mattresses and blankets. They were not given sheets or pillows. The toilet had no curtain. 50.

There were no beds and the detainees were not given any mattresses, sheets or blankets. Some detainees had to sleep in the corridor.

He received two bed sheets, a pillow case, two towels, a blanket, a mattress, a pillow, a spoon and a mug. The temperature in the cells was between +18 0 C and + 25 0 C.

This represents a policy and legislative intent which is not blanket or indiscriminate as such but one which distinguishes between cases.

He averred that he had not contributed to the length of the proceedings and that he could not be blamed for having used the domestic remedies at his disposal.

In addition, the information gathered indicated that the provision of mattresses and blankets was a very recent development.

    The applicants complain under Article 10 of the Convention and under Article 3 of Protocol No. 1 that they were subject to a “blanket ban” on voting in the independence referendum.

    Pursuant to no. 15.1 of the Police Custody Regulations, detention cells had to be equipped with a fixed bed, a mattress, one to two blankets and an interphone or bell.

In his petition the applicant referred to various marital misunderstandings and quarrels for which he blamed the respondent.

Iceland , judgment of 25   June 1992, Series A no. 239, p. 27, § 63, and Bladet Tromsø and Stensaas v. Norway [GC], no. 21980/93, § 62, ECHR 1999-III). 44.