In August 1999 the applicant and his wife separated.

On 28 April 2001 the summons was served on the applicant’s wife. 15.

  Before the Commission he is represented by his wife, Yvonne Hoteit.     A.

The applicant and his wife did not support the idea of a long-term placement, and initially decided to apply for H to live with them.

that his wife also had a right to a long-term visit.

CIVILE, a rendu l'arrêt suivant : Sur le moyen unique, pris en ses deux premières branches : Attendu, selon l'arrêt attaqué (Lyon, 3 mai 2012) et les productions, que la société Conan World Wide

His wife was 25 of age. At his earliest release she would have been 28.

The applicants are the wife and son of O.I.M., who was apprehended at his house in Makiivka, Donetsk region, by militants of the “Donetsk People’s Republic” (“DPR”) on 3 September 2018.

AU NOM DU PEUPLE FRANÇAIS _________________________ LA COUR DE CASSATION, CHAMBRE COMMERCIALE, FINANCIÈRE ET ÉCONOMIQUE, a rendu la décision suivante : Vu le pourvoi formé par la société VM Food & Wines

The application concerns the delayed provision of compensation to the applicant for property of his wife (who passed away in 2010 and was succeeded by the applicant and his son) expropriated in 1986 by

At the material time, the first applicant was working and living in Germany with his wife, who was on unpaid maternity leave.

The wife left Turkey for England and began divorce proceedings.

The applicant is a widower, his wife having died in November 1998. He cares for the three children of the marriage, born in 1993, 1995 and 1998.

    In May 2011 the applicant and his wife had another child. 19.

margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:10pt } COUR EUROPÉENNE DES DROITS DE L’HOMME     303   2.6.1999     Communiqué du Greffier     AUDIENCE DANS L’AFFAIRE WILLE

It also ordered the applicant to pay his ex-wife a compensation of 500 Euros.

Par une requête, enregistrée le 30 novembre 2023, la société par actions simplifiée (SAS) Azur réalisation, la société en nom collectif (SNC) Ar Delille et la société à responsabilité limitée (SARL) Wise

The applicant and his wife were resident in Baden. They separated in September 2002. Subsequently, the applicant's wife brought divorce proceedings before the Baden District Court.

Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, as amended by Protocol No. 11 (hereinafter referred to as “the Convention”),   Having regard to the final judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in the Wille

, for by their matrimonial consent and contract the wife hath given up herself in this kind unto her husband, which she cannot retract."