Relevant domestic law and practice 1.     The Basic Law 14.

    RELEVANT DOMESTIC LAW AND INTERNATIONAL DOCUMENTS 57.

The latter had retained its competence to rule on custody matters, as D.P. had unlawfully removed the child to Austria and the applicant had made a timely request for her return under Article 10 of the

Under the relevant law, as in force at the time in question, his changing his domicile could not have prompted losing his right to exemption. 23.

  3237), a violation of federal law.

They went outside, and it was the last time they were seen alive.

A few moments later they had been joined by an acquaintance, R.

This time he read aloud the above ‑ mentioned documents to the applicant directly.

The Court also notes that on this point the Supreme Administrative Court had held that, as the law did not provide time-limits within which the administrative body had to comply with final judgments, the

The main proceedings, which had concerned a claim for a land allocation decision, had been pending before that court for three years and two months at the time the compensation claim was filed.

The child had sat on his mother’s lap all the time, hugged her, touched her face, and laughed with her. The mother had given M. juice and sweets that she had brought with her.

However, by this time, Mr de Menezes was in the underground station.

Later there came “contract” soldiers and killed everyone who was there. By that time the district was under firm control of the federal forces, and there was no more fighting. 46.

No transitional provisions were set out in respect of persons whose claims had already become time-barred under the law as then in force. 29 .

THE LAW I.     ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 10 OF THE CONVENTION 40.

       DOMESTIC CASE-LAW 48 .

They asked the President of the Supreme Court to allow their request, set the shortest possible time-limit for deciding the appeal on points of law and award them appropriate compensation. 40.

The latter refused to treat him so the police left him there. 17 .

    On 16 March 2009 the applicant lodged an appeal on points of law against the Court of Appeal’s decision, together with a request that the missed one-month time-limit for appeal be renewed