CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes
Exporter CSV

868 résultats pour « Sebastien TO »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:1126DEC004149319

Admin. suprême

26 novembre 2024

26 novembre 2024

due to a lack of funds.

Source officielle

Page 25 sur 44

← PrécédentSuivant →
CE

CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-184867

Admin. suprême

4 juillet 2018

4 juillet 2018

the government of the respondent State and the applicants and having been satisfied that the settlements were based on respect for human rights as defined in the Convention or its Protocols, decided to

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:1218DEC004118823

Admin. suprême

18 décembre 2025

18 décembre 2025

THE LAW Joinder of the applications Having regard to the similar subject matter of the applications, the Court finds it appropriate to examine them jointly in a single decision.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2026:0326DEC003338221

Admin. suprême

26 mars 2026

26 mars 2026

THE LAW    Joinder of the applications Having regard to the similar subject matter of the applications, the Court finds it appropriate to examine them jointly in a single decision.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2026:0409DEC005270020

Admin. suprême

9 avril 2026

9 avril 2026

The observations were forwarded to the applicants, who were invited to submit their own observations (see the appended table for the relevant dates). No reply was received to the Registry’s letter.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2026:0326DEC001449721

Admin. suprême

26 mars 2026

26 mars 2026

THE LAW    Joinder of the applications Having regard to the similar subject matter of the applications, the Court finds it appropriate to examine them jointly in a single decision.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0923DEC008170817

Admin. suprême

23 septembre 2025

23 septembre 2025

The court heard the applicant to determine whether he pleaded guilty to the offence.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0425JUD005279821

Admin. suprême

25 avril 2024

25 avril 2024

    Having regard to the similar subject matter of the applications, the Court finds it appropriate to examine them jointly in a single judgment.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:0323DEC001342502

Admin. suprême

23 mars 2004

23 mars 2004

O'Boyle , Section Registrar , Having regard to the above application lodged on 21 August 2001, Having deliberated, decides as follows: THE FACTS The applicant, Mr Sebastian Michta, is a Polish national

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:1121DEC002309220

Admin. suprême

21 novembre 2023

21 novembre 2023

position to request an arrest warrant.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0328JUD004308716

Admin. suprême

28 mars 2024

28 mars 2024

was an effective remedy for grievances similar to those of the applicants, allowing them to have the violation of the Convention acknowledged, either explicitly or in substance, and to receive adequate

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-6542

Admin. suprême

28 juillet 1999

28 juillet 1999

The frequency with which violations were found showed that there was an accumulation of identical breaches which were sufficiently numerous to amount not merely to isolated incidents.

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;FORTHCOMINGJUDGMENTS;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-2650120-2894181

Admin. suprême

27 février 2009

27 février 2009

The applicants rely on Article 6 §§ 1 (right to a fair trial) and 3 (d) (right to examine witnesses) with regard to the Romanian courts’ refusal to admit evidence they wished to adduce and Article 10 (

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2026:0326DEC001483522

Admin. suprême

26 mars 2026

26 mars 2026

THE LAW    Joinder of the applications Having regard to the similar subject matter of the applications, the Court finds it appropriate to examine them jointly in a single decision.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2026:0326DEC003248622

Admin. suprême

26 mars 2026

26 mars 2026

THE LAW    Joinder of the applications Having regard to the similar subject matter of the applications, the Court finds it appropriate to examine them jointly in a single decision.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:1119DEC002420816

Admin. suprême

19 novembre 2020

19 novembre 2020

The observations were forwarded to the applicants, who were invited to submit their own observations. No reply was received by the Court.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0411JUD000542817

Admin. suprême

11 avril 2024

11 avril 2024

    However, in the present applications the applicants either ceased to be held in conditions that were allegedly contrary to the Convention before 13   January 2021 or continue to be held

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:1204JUD001394815

Admin. suprême

4 décembre 2025

4 décembre 2025

(equivalent to EUR   56 at the material time) respectively, corresponding to 3% of the claim pursued, according to the legal provisions in force at the relevant time.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0918DEC000291211

Admin. suprême

18 septembre 2012

18 septembre 2012

by failing to take any steps in order to enforce the judicial decision ordering his father to leave the apartment.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:1003DEC002732921

Admin. suprême

3 octobre 2023

3 octobre 2023

Where the direct victim died before the application was lodged with the Court, the Court has usually declined to grant standing to any other person unless that person was able to either demonstrate a direct

Source officielle