CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes
Exporter CSV

2 899 résultats pour « Merrily ADRASSE »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-120352

Admin. suprême

6 mai 2013

6 mai 2013

They had merely asserted that they were likely to be affected by these provisions as they were mobile phone and internet users and exercised certain professions.

Source officielle

Page 25 sur 145

← PrécédentSuivant →
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1970:0714DEC000407869

Admin. suprême

14 juillet 1970

14 juillet 1970

He also informed the Court as to the address of the applicant's nephew and requested that inquiries be made with the staff of the public house concerned in order to get hold of the addresses of the two

Source officielle
CA

3ème CHAMBRE FAMILLE

6799c945d742d0b11d26be49

Appel

28 janvier 2025

28 janvier 2025

L'actif successoral comprend notamment une maison d'habitation située [Adresse 5], désormais en indivision entre Mme [R] [Y] [K], M. [A] [C] et M. [Z] [W].

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2001:0522DEC004473098

Admin. suprême

22 mai 2001

22 mai 2001

The decision of the Supreme Court to dismiss her appeal on the ground of the loss of locus standi (without examining the merits of the case) merely because she had exercised her constitutional right to

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1989:1120JUD001057283

Admin. suprême

20 novembre 1989

20 novembre 1989

This was, however, merely a value judgment. (c) The proceedings in the Federal Court of Justice (Bundesgerichtshof) 17.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1987:0825JUD001030083

Admin. suprême

25 août 1987

25 août 1987

The Court heard addresses by Mrs. Maier for the Government, by Mr. Weitzel for the Commission and by Mr. Bergemann for the applicant, as well as their replies to its questions. 10.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0207JUD004139415

Admin. suprême

7 février 2023

7 février 2023

According to the investigating judge, the applicant had thus not been deprived of the possibility to use the Ijekavian variant of Serbian but had merely been “required to use the court’s official language

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1998:0219JUD002802895

Admin. suprême

19 février 1998

19 février 1998

The Court heard addresses by Mr Soyer, Mr Benedicto Gil and Mr   Borrego Borrego. Mr Benedicto Gil produced various documents at the hearing. AS TO THE FACTS I.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1994:0512DEC001859591

Admin. suprême

12 mai 1994

12 mai 1994

The request shall further contain the addresses of those applying for proceedings to be instituted and, as far as possible, the addresses of all those affected by the proceedings (section 41, subsection

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0705JUD004618208

Admin. suprême

5 juillet 2016

5 juillet 2016

    The Court considers that this matter is closely related to the merits of the complaint. Accordingly, it joins the issue to the merits. 30.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0318JUD001320105

Admin. suprême

18 mars 2010

18 mars 2010

It was also decided to examine the merits of the application at the same time as its admissibility (Article 29 § 3). THE FACTS I.     THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE 5.

Source officielle
CA

3ème chambre A

68df5d714a4e15bf2fe4fa1e

Appel

2 octobre 2025

2 octobre 2025

Le [Adresse 9] n'a pas présenté de moyens à ce titre.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1999:0202DEC003191396

Admin. suprême

2 février 1999

2 février 1999

However, no precise addresses were submitted.

Source officielle
CA

Pôle 1 - Chambre 5

6a210ae4cdc6046d47092bce

Appel

3 juin 2026

3 juin 2026

HSBC CONTINENTAL EUROPE, autrefois dénommée HSBC FRANCE [Adresse 1] [Localité 2] Représentée par Me Anne-Gaëlle LE MERLUS de la SCP LUSSAN, avocat au barreau de PARIS, toque : P77 à DÉFENDEURS

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1999:1130DEC003273196

Admin. suprême

30 novembre 1999

30 novembre 1999

R. had not been given a possibility to address the court, that the court had made it impossible for them to lodge an appeal and that the proceedings had lasted too long.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0710DEC003433302

Admin. suprême

10 juillet 2007

10 juillet 2007

The national courts had merely used stereotyped formulations and referred to earlier decisions.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0618JUD000445709

Admin. suprême

18 juin 2019

18 juin 2019

the effect that that the applicant did not live on that address.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-111865

Admin. suprême

13 juin 2012

13 juin 2012

The applicant insisted that he had been infected during a tooth extraction procedure in the colony as medical equipment had merely been cleaned with water without being properly sterilised.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-12009

Admin. suprême

17 juillet 2018

17 juillet 2018

performances on http://pussy-riot.livejournal.com were extremist within the meaning of the Suppression of Extremism Act and ordered that access to that material be limited by a filter on the website’s IP address

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-231653

Admin. suprême

22 février 2024

22 février 2024

On the contrary, given the domestic legal framework, as well the applicants’ own clear wish to have the criminal case against them examined on the merits, the trial court had had no other option but to

Source officielle