CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes
Exporter CSV

977 résultats pour « Marie-Alice GUIDETTI »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1988:0512DEC001217586

Admin. suprême

12 mai 1988

12 mai 1988

  (4)   The Head of the Security Service may approach the Prime Minister himself on matters of supreme importance and delicacy, but this is not to say that the Prime Minister has any direct responsiblity

Page 25 sur 49

← PrécédentSuivant →
Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-112530

Admin. suprême

10 juillet 2012

10 juillet 2012

If intelligence is regularly shared with a State where there exists the possibility that torture may be employed, when should a prosecution against a man who has been in the hands of that State be stayed

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0429JUD004282019

Admin. suprême

29 avril 2025

29 avril 2025

BULGARIA (Application no. 42820/19)             JUDGMENT   STRASBOURG 29 April 2025   This judgment is final but it may be subject to editorial revision.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0925JUD001253506

Admin. suprême

25 septembre 2014

25 septembre 2014

    The relevant excerpts from the Code of Good Practice in Electoral Matters (Guidelines and Explanatory Report) (CDL-AD (2002) 23 rev), adopted by the European Commission for Democracy Through

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2026:0402JUD003081713

Admin. suprême

2 avril 2026

2 avril 2026

    The facts of the case may be summarised as follows. 5.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1998:0518DEC002983996

Admin. suprême

18 mai 1998

18 mai 1998

       By decision of 3 May 1994 the tapping of telephone line "A" was prolonged for four weeks as from 5 May 1994.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:1024JUD002304819

Admin. suprême

24 octobre 2023

24 octobre 2023

It may be subject to editorial revision.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:1110JUD004477498

Admin. suprême

10 novembre 2005

10 novembre 2005

    In its judgment of 27 May 1999 (E. 1998/58, K. 1999/19), which was published in the Official Gazette of 4 March 2000, the Constitutional Court stated, inter alia : “The legislature and executive

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0403JUD000979617

Admin. suprême

3 avril 2025

3 avril 2025

Kirakosyan, Representative of the Republic of Armenia on International Legal Matters. 4.     The facts of the case may be summarised as follows. incident of 19 July 2016 5 .

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1984:0522JUD000962681

Admin. suprême

22 mai 1984

22 mai 1984

On the other hand, the commanding general or the designated officer may in appropriate circumstances leave the case to be dealt with as a disciplinary matter (Article 12).

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0110JUD002908612

Admin. suprême

10 janvier 2017

10 janvier 2017

This fact was brought to the applicants’ attention on 11   August 2008 through a recommendation entitled “Guidelines on dealing with religious matters in schools” (see paragraph 27 below).

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0708JUD004220207

Admin. suprême

8 juillet 2010

8 juillet 2010

Any violation of secret suffrage should be sanctioned (guideline I.4.d). 54.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:1104DEC004281210

Admin. suprême

4 novembre 2014

4 novembre 2014

The judgment was not appealed against and became final and binding on 3 May 2002. 28.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:1029JUD003010018

Admin. suprême

29 octobre 2019

29 octobre 2019

The guidelines were, inter alia , that the composition of the City Administration should reflect the last (1991) census and that the unified council and electoral system should provide for: representation

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:1108JUD001896807

Admin. suprême

8 novembre 2011

8 novembre 2011

It may be subject to editorial revision . In the case of V.C. v.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-114381

Admin. suprême

10 octobre 2012

10 octobre 2012

The facts of the case, as submitted by the applicant, may be summarised as follows. A.     The circumstances of the case 1.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1996:1127DEC002234093

Admin. suprême

27 novembre 1996

27 novembre 1996

A judge had the obligation to obtain and assess evidence in each case in an impartial manner and the mere fact that he had decided a parallel matter did not give rise to doubt that he would not respect

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0625DEC004047713

Admin. suprême

25 juin 2019

25 juin 2019

In order to guarantee the effectiveness of these rights, it may nevertheless be necessary to protect them in relations between private persons.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:0518DEC002566002

Admin. suprême

18 mai 2004

18 mai 2004

Release may be conditioned by guarantees to appear for trial.”

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0424JUD001465904

Admin. suprême

24 avril 2008

24 avril 2008

least tacitly waived any rights they may have had under Article 6 concerning the issue of impartiality of the judge. 35.

Source officielle