Spain , 28 October 1998, § 45, Reports 1998-VIII; Miragall Escolano and Others v. Spain , no. 38366/97, § 33, ECHR 2000-I; and Mizzi v. Malta , no. 26111/02, § 83, ECHR 2006 ‑ I (extracts)).

must make its assessment in each case in the light of the special features of the proceedings in question and by reference to the object and purpose of Article 6 § 1 (see, mutatis mutandis , Miragall Escolano

an appeal from the moment they can effectively apprise themselves of court decisions imposing a burden on them or which may infringe their legitimate rights or interests (see for example Miragall Escolano

Ce faisant, le tribunal a retenu que le mauvais entretien, la finition défectueuse des sols, les défaillances récurrentes des escalators et les retards apportés au remplacement des sources de lumière en

Association Syndicale Libre destinée à assurer notamment la gestion, le nettoyage et l'entretien de tous les espaces à usage commun tels que parkings, parvis, espaces verts, voiries, espaces verticaux (escalators

Ltd facturant à Microtracteur diffusion un « crawler escalator » XN 08 d'un poids de 800 kg ; que ces éléments caractérisent comme le soutiennent les appelantes, à la fois la réalité d'achats par la société

protect potential defendants from stale claims, the manner in which they were applied in a particular case may give rise to a breach of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention (see, mutatis mutandis, Miragall Escolano

prevents litigants from using an available remedy and a claim from being examined on the merits, in breach of the right to the effective protection of the courts (see, mutatis mutandis , Miragall Escolano

its assessment in each case in the light of the special features of the proceedings in question and by reference to the object and purpose of Article   6 § 1 (see, mutatis mutandis , Miragall Escolano

The role of the Court is, above all, to verify whether the effects of such interpretation are compatible with the Convention (see Miragall Escolano and Others v.

That being so, the rules in question, or the manner in which they are applied, should not prevent litigants from using an available remedy (see Miragall Escolano and Others v. Spain , nos.

make its assessment in each case in the light of the particular features of the proceedings in question and by reference to the object and purpose of Article 6 § 1 (see, mutatis mutandis , Miragall Escolano

prevent the applicants' action being examined on the merits, with the attendant risk that their right to the effective protection of the courts would be infringed (see, mutatis mutandis , Miragall Escolano

Having regard to its limited powers regarding the interpretation and application of national law (see Miragall Escolano and Others v.

That being so, the rules in question, or the manner in which they are applied, should not prevent litigants from using an available remedy (see Miragall Escolano and Others v.

  55782/00, §   36, ECHR 2002-VIII) and Miragall Escolano and Others v.   Spain (nos.   38366/97 and 9 others, §   36, ECHR 2000-I). 60 .

or to lodge an appeal from the moment they can effectively apprise themselves of decisions imposing a burden on them or which may infringe their legitimate rights or interests (see Miragall   Escolano

time-limits applicable to legal remedies are intended to ensure a proper administration of justice and compliance with, in particular, the principle of legal certainty (see, mutatis mutandis , Miragall Escolano

be complied with in lodging legal remedies are aimed at ensuring a proper administration of justice and compliance, in particular, with the principle of legal certainty (see, for example, Miragall Escolano