32363/16 the Government raised a preliminary objection of non-compliance with the admissibility criteria established by Article   35 § 2 (b) of the Convention, claiming that the applicant’s

    However, in their observations the Government did not allege that this circumstance precluded the examination of the case by the Court pursuant to Article 35 § 2 (b) of the Convention, which

    Le Gouvernement observe ensuite que la présente requête est essentiellement la même que celle de l’affaire Del Río Prada, se référant à l’article   35 § 2 b) de la Convention. 30.

35 § 2 (b) of the Convention.

It follows that this part of the application is manifestly ill-founded within the meaning of Article 35 § 3 of the Convention and must be rejected under Article 35 § 4. 2.

According to Article 35 § 2 (b) of the Convention, the Court shall not deal with any application submitted under Article 34 of the Convention that is substantially the same as a matter that has already

  35811/97, § 54, 2 August 2005). 35.

Pursuant to Article 9(4), such procedures must provide adequate and effective remedies, including injunctive relief as appropriate, and be fair, equitable, timely and not prohibitively expensive. 2.

82 of the Code of Criminal Procedure) –failure to communicate principal public prosecutor’s observations in those proceedings before Court of Appeal (Article 35 § 2 of Code of Criminal Procedure in force

    According to Article 35 § 2 (b), an application is to be declared inadmissible if it “is substantially the same as a matter that has already been examined by the Court ... and contains no

This raises a question of admissibility under Article   35 § 2 (b) of the Convention, which reads as follows: “2.

35 § 2 (b) of the Convention, the former Human Rights Chamber being such a procedure.

follows that this part of the application is substantially the same as the matter that has already been submitted to another procedure of international investigation or settlement within the meaning of Article

    The Government submitted that the application was inadmissible in so far as the tenth applicant was concerned, as under Article 35 § 2 (b) the Court could not deal with an application which

    The Government also raised an objection concerning admissibility under Article 35 § 2 (b) of the Convention in respect of either the whole application or at least the part of the complaint

The question therefore arises whether the present complaint is inadmissible under Article 35 § 2 (b) and 4 of the Convention, which provides, in so far as relevant, as follows: “2.

This part of the application should therefore be declared inadmissible pursuant to Article 35 §§ 2 (b) and 4 of the Convention. C.

    Le requérant soutient que sa requête n’est pas manifestement mal fondée et qu’elle satisfait à toutes les autres conditions de recevabilité énumérées à l’article 35 § 2 de la Convention.

Le Gouvernement soulève ensuite que la requête serait irrecevable en ce qu’elle est identique à une requête qui a été précédemment examinée par la Cour au sens de l’article 35 § 2 de la Convention qui