CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-246042
13 octobre 2025
Consequently, it ordered that compensation for the de facto expropriation be paid to the applicants in proportion to their shares, together with “statutory interest” accruing from the date they brought
Page 24 sur 238
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:1003JUD004672611
3 octobre 2013
She also asked that her share in the ownership of a jointly owned car be established. 9.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:1122JUD002260302
22 novembre 2007
Each founder was declared to hold 14.28% of the applicant's share capital.
CASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-1274
15 octobre 2009
a 2001 amendment to the Commercial Code shareholders of joint-stock companies were given the power to wind up the company and transfer all its assets to any shareholder owning more than 90% of its shares
ECLI:CEDH:002-12459
7 mai 2019
fulfil its aims, because it no longer had any assets except for two buildings which generated its sole revenue from rents, any donations it received were minimal, the income indicated in its balance sheet
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:1024JUD003122214
24 octobre 2024
It follows that the parts of the complaint relating to those claims are incompatible ratione materiae with the provisions of the Convention and the Protocols thereto within the meaning of
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0624DEC000067415
24 juin 2025
or to perform other acts aimed at the separate alienation of their respective shares, and that those shares could not be regarded as separate “possessions” as such because they were attached to an apartment
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:0210DEC002804695
10 février 2000
attorney to sell company shares without having the right to do so.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0922JUD001607890
22 septembre 2009
G80; description: field; area: 5,342 sq. m; share: ½; (b) Nicosia, Yerollakkos, plot no. 189, sheet/plan: XXI/43.W.I, registration no.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:1124JUD004633699
24 novembre 2005
The legal requirements for the organisation of meetings are laid down in the Meetings and Marches Act of 1990 („Закон за събранията, митингите и манифестациите“).
CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1990:0907DEC001225986
7 septembre 1990
Further, the company had failed to appear at a negotiation meeting convened by the local branch for 28 February 1985 and to a central negotiation meeting, convened by the Union for 21 May 1985, in breach
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:0514DEC006719901
14 mai 2002
In 1950, a 1/6 share in the joint ownership belonging to the applicant’s uncle was also formally confiscated. The applicant’s share was never formally confiscated.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:1126DEC002943902
26 novembre 2002
The Law therefore stays the execution of all writs by the State Bailiffs’ Office against the assets of undertakings in which the State holds at least 25% of the share capital.
ECLI:CEDH:001-161837
10 mars 2016
Committee instituted criminal proceedings on account of aggravated tax evasion against the applicant, former executive director and founder of “Pizza Di Roma” LLC (the company) who held 100% of its shares
ECLI:CEDH:001-110027
26 janvier 2012
Moreover, he had to share a room with fourteen other detainees. Some of the detainees were smokers, although his medical condition prohibited the applicant from being an active or passive smoker.
ECLI:CEDH:001-128012
8 octobre 2013
On 18 January 2010 the debtor’s capital was transferred to the Share Fund of the Republic of Serbia.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0105DEC006897801
5 janvier 2006
Z.B. owned the remaining 81% of shares and was also the owner of an American company.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:0406DEC004626099
6 avril 2004
She stated that the incident occurred around 9.30 a.m.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0613JUD006608301
13 juin 2006
His own share in the above land as well as the share inherited from Mrs D. passed to the applicant and her sister. 7.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:0924JUD003052696
24 septembre 2002
Following the death of the brother and his wife in 1967, the estates, including the applicants, claimed that they were entitled to a share of the profits on the contracts concluded by the brother.