January 2009 as a Chamber composed of:   Christos Rozakis, President,   Anatoly Kovler,   Elisabeth Steiner,   Khanlar Hajiyev,   Dean Spielmann,   Sverre Erik Jebens

prise en la personne de son représentant légal [Adresse 3] [Localité 5] représentée et assistée par Maître Olivier JESSEL, avocat au barreau de PARIS, toque : B0811 COMPOSITION DE LA COUR :

    La Cour constate que ce grief n’est pas manifestement mal fondé au sens de l’article 35 § 3 de la Convention.

    On 27 March 2006 the investigation was resumed.

The Administrative Court’s decision was served on the applicants’ lawyer on 11   March 1998. 11.

Denmark (dec.), no. 44704/98 , 14   June 2001; Jensen   and Rasmussen v. Denmark (dec.), no. 52620/99 , 20   March 2003; Nardone v. Italy (dec.), no.

Jebens ,   Mr   G. Malinverni, judges , and Mr S.

Jessel, Mmes Michel-Amsellem, Kerner-Menay, conseillers, Mme Guéguen, premier avocat général, et Mme Mégnien, greffier fonctionnel-expert, la Cour de cassation, siégeant en chambre mixte, composée de

He applied again to the same prosecutor on 29   March and on 1, 9 and 19 April. On 16 May 1996 the applicant applied once again to the governor's office. 15.

    That decision was upheld at last instance on 21 March 1995. 12.

It may be subject to editorial revision. In the case of Gisayev v.

In May there were four meetings with A. They took place on 6, 13, 20 and 27 May 2005. In June there were four meetings with A. which took place on 2, 10, 17 and 24 June 2005.

Payment was made on 5   May 2004. 21.

-FZ of 30 March 1995).

is final but may be subject to editorial revision.

    In a decision of 7 March 2002, the text of which was deposited with the registry on 6 May 2002, the Court of Appeal found that the length of the proceedings had been excessive for the following

is final but may be subject to editorial revision.

    Le 9 janvier 2006, le requérant demanda la fixation de la date de l'audience, qui eut lieu le 26 mars 2007. 15.

Jebens, juges, et de M. S. Nielsen, greffier de section , Après en avoir délibéré en chambre du conseil le 13 octobre 2005, Rend l’arrêt que voici, adopté à cette date   : PROCÉDURE 1.